Review Article

Korean Journal of Agricultural Science. 1 December 2025. 383-396
https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.520401

ABSTRACT


MAIN

  • Introduction

  • Evaluation of In Vitro Oocyte Maturation

  •   Nuclear maturation

  •   Cytoplasmic maturation

  • Improved Strategies for Enhancing IVM Outcomes

  • Integrated Protocols of IVM and Oocyte Cryopreservation in Reproductive Biotechnology

  • Applications of IVM-Derived Oocytes in Animal Biotechnology: IVP, SCNT, and Genome Editing

  • Conclusion and Future Perspectives

Introduction

In vitro maturation (IVM) of mammalian oocytes is one of the oldest experimental successes in reproductive biology. In the 1930s, mouse oocytes were shown to resume meiosis and reach metaphase II (MII) after removal from their follicular environment (Pincus and Enzmann, 1935). This finding was later confirmed in livestock such as sheep, cattle, and goats, where oocytes collected ex vivo could undergo maturation, fertilization, and embryonic development (Moor and Trounson, 1977; Leibfried and First, 1979; Szöllösi et al., 1988). Clinical translation in humans followed in the 1990s, with improved culture systems allowing consistent embryo development and pregnancies (Chian et al., 2004).

In vivo, mammalian oocytes enter meiosis during fetal life and stop at prophase I, known as the germinal vesicle (GV) stage. After puberty, gonadotropin signaling induces meiotic resumption, first polar body extrusion, and arrest at MII until fertilization (Eppig and O’Brien, 1996; Conti and Franciosi, 2018). While nuclear maturation marks such as polar body release are critical, developmental competence requires cytoplasmic maturation: redistribution of mitochondria, maternal RNA regulation, cytoskeletal remodeling, and redox control (Combelles et al., 2002; Watson, 2007). These events are normally supported by cumulus and granulosa cells, cAMP/cGMP gradients, and kinase cascades (Ferreira et al., 2009; Gilchrist and Smitz, 2023; Martinez et al., 2023).

The motivation for IVM differs between livestock and human fields. In agriculture, IVM is indispensable for in vitro embryo production (IVP), enabling the maturation of oocytes from slaughterhouse ovaries or ovum pick-up (OPU) of genetically superior cows, followed by IVF and embryo transfer (Ealy et al., 2019; Lonergan, 2024). IVM oocytes also serve as essential cytoplasts for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) and as the entry point for genome editing by CRISPR/Cas9 in cattle, pigs, sheep, and goats (Campbell et al., 1996a; Campbell, 1999; Lin et al., 2022). In human assisted reproductive technology (ART), IVM lowers the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), benefits women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and provides fertility preservation options for oncology patients (Archer and Chang, 2004; Siristatidis et al., 2018; Chatzimeletiou et al., 2025).

Climate change also highlights the importance of IVM. Heat stress reduces oocyte quality and embryo survival, especially in dairy cattle, where IVM can provide a stable in vitro environment less affected by seasonal variation (Hansen, 2009; Cavallari et al., 2019; Roth, 2021; Lee et al., 2023). Delayed childbearing and the need for fertility preservation further increase the demand for IVM in human medicine (Llonch et al., 2021; Telfer et al., 2023).

Despite progress, IVM-derived oocytes often show lower developmental competency, largely due to abnormal mitochondria and spindles, oxidative stress, and incomplete epigenetic remodeling (Dvoran et al., 2022; Jiang et al., 2023). To optimize media conditions, co-culture with cumulus cells, use of microfluidic systems, and identification of omics-based biomarkers have been employed (Trapphoff et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2016; Iwasaki et al., 2018; Kassim et al., 2025).

In this review, we summarize recent progress and future perspectives related to IVM. First, we examine current methods for evaluating nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation, with emphasis on morphological, molecular, and functional indicators of oocyte competence. Second, we discuss improved strategies to enhance IVM efficiency, including optimized culture conditions, co-culture systems, and emerging biotechnologies such as microfluidics and omics-based biomarkers. Third, we explore the integration of IVM with oocyte cryopreservation in ART, highlighting its potential for fertility preservation and safer clinical applications. Finally, we review the use of IVM-derived oocytes in animal biotechnology, including IVP, SCNT, and genome editing.

Evaluation of In Vitro Oocyte Maturation

The evaluation of IVM requires an integrated consideration of nuclear and cytoplasmic events. Although extrusion of the first polar body is often regarded as the canonical endpoint of maturation, it does not fully reflect the competence of the oocyte. Reliable assessment therefore depends on combining morphological, cytoskeletal, molecular, and functional parameters (summarized in Table 1).

Table 1.

Indicators and methods for evaluating in vitro oocyte maturation.

Category Indicator Method Relevance
Nuclear Polar body extrusion/size Light microscopy, 
ImageJ quantification
Basic marker of MII; 
abnormal PB size indicates division errors
Spindle integrity α/β/γ-tubulin immunostaining Detects abnormal spindle/centrosome organization
Actin polarity Phalloidin staining, capping index Reflects cortical polarization, asymmetric division
Ploidy status Chromosome spreads, 
kinetochore staining, array-CGH
Direct assessment of euploidy/aneuploidy in MII
Cytoplasmic Maternal mRNA dynamics qRT-PCR, RNA-seq Evaluates transcript clearance/stability
Mitochondria MitoTracker, JC-1, 
qPCR for mtDNA
Distribution, potential, 
copy number linked to competence
ROS/redox H2DCFDA, MitoSOX High ROS linked to poor competence
Lipid content Nile Red, BODIPY, Raman/FTIR Reflects energy stores, stress susceptibility
ER & cortical granules Calreticulin IF, LCA-FITC Readiness for fertilization, polyspermy block
Glucose metabolism BCB test Assessing glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase

CGH, comparative genomic hybridization; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; BCB, Brilliant Cresyl Blue.

Nuclear maturation

The extrusion of the first polar body in the oocyte is the mostly widely used marker of meiosis I completion and entry into MII (Younis et al., 2009). More refined approaches quantify the size and morphology of the polar body, as excessively large polar bodies may indicate spindle positioning defects and compromised asymmetric division (Lee and Choi, 2023).

Assessment of spindle assembly provides additional resolution. Immunostaining of α- and β-tubulin is employed to evaluate spindle shape and integrity, while γ-tubulin localization highlights the organization of microtubule-organizing centers (Meng et al., 2004; Howe and FitzHarris, 2013).

The actin cytoskeleton also serves as a robust indicator. F-actin capping at the cortex overlying the spindle is required for asymmetric division and polar body extrusion. Fluorescent phalloidin staining combined with line-scan intensity profiling can be used to generate a capping index, reflecting the degree of actin polarization (Almonacid et al., 2014; Jo et al., 2015). Beyond morphology, protein–protein interactions can be probed by proximity ligation assays (PLA) to verify the functional association between spindle and polarity proteins. For example, PLA signals between SPECC1L and γ-tubulin have been shown to indicate their interaction during spindle positioning (Lee and Choi, 2023).

Oocyte ploidy analysis has progressively advanced since the introduction of chromosome-spreading techniques using MII oocytes, in which zona-free oocytes are spread on slides, stained, and scored for individual chromosome numbers (Stein and Schindler, 2011). This classic method remains a cornerstone for assessing aneuploidy rates in small-animal IVM models. Subsequently, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) enabled targeted interrogation of specific chromosome sets. The development of array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) provided genome-wide detection of full-chromosome copy-number changes in single oocytes or polar bodies (Colls et al., 2012). Most recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches have achieved single-cell resolution, offering high sensitivity and specificity for detecting aneuploidy and sub-chromosomal abnormalities in oocytes and blastocysts (Treff et al., 2016).

Cytoplasmic maturation

The early embryo largely relies on maternal transcripts and proteins accumulated during oogenesis. Maternal mRNA turnover, organelle redistribution, energy metabolism, and redox homeostasis are essential for successful development (Ferreira et al., 2009; Nikalayevich et al., 2025). In particular, maternal mRNA metabolism has emerged as a key determinant of oocyte quality and developmental competence. Recent studies show that translational control and selective degradation of stored transcripts are important for fertilization and the maternal-to-zygotic transition (Yang et al., 2024). For example, poly (A) tail remodeling, RNA-binding proteins, and small RNA-mediated pathways precisely regulate maternal transcript utilization in mammalian oocytes, and defects in these processes can lead to meiotic errors and compromised embryo development. Together, the remodeling of maternal mRNA stores is a central layer of cytoplasmic maturation, with direct implications for IVM protocols and their ability to generate competent gametes (Ermisch and Wood, 2024; Lee et al., 2024).

Mitochondrial quality can be accessed via morphology and the spatial organization. Distribution patterns, membrane potential (ΔΨm), and copy number are routinely assessed using fluorescent probes such as MitoTracker, JC-1, or TMRE, and qPCR-based mtDNA quantification (Wai et al., 2010; Feng et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2025). Aberrant clustering or peripheral localization correlates with reduced competence (Kirillova et al., 2021).

The oxidative state of the oocyte can be monitored using H2DCFDA or MitoSOX probes to quantify ROS levels. High ROS and reduced glutathione (GSH) content are associated with poor developmental outcomes (Voros et al., 2025). Complementary to this, the lipid content and distribution of the ooplasm are emerging as quality markers, especially in bovine oocytes where high lipid accumulation predisposes embryos to heat and oxidative stress (De Andrade Melo-Sterza and Poehland, 2021). Fluorescent dyes such as Nile Red or BODIPY are used to quantify lipid droplets and map their spatial distribution (Genicot et al., 2005). The reduced GSH system is the most critical non-enzymatic defense mechanism in the ooplasm, and its concentration is a robust marker of competence. In oocytes with reduced developmental potential, such as prepubertal models, a decreased ability to synthesize GSH is observed. The ratio of reduced GSH to oxidized glutathione (GSSG) is the definitive measure of the cellular redox state, and a significantly lower GSH/GSSG ratio directly correlates with subsequent developmental failures (Jiao et al., 2013). Other structural indicators include endoplasmic reticulum (ER) reorganization and cortical granule migration. Immunostaining for ER markers (e.g., calreticulin) or lectin staining for cortical granules allows evaluation of cytoplasmic readiness for fertilization and polyspermy block (Mehlmann et al., 1995).

Metabolic activity provides an additional functional dimension for evaluating oocyte competence, as these assays are specifically designed to test whether energy utilization and redox regulation can predict developmental potential. The Brilliant Cresyl Blue (BCB) test remains one of the simplest approaches, assessing glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) activity that declines with oocyte growth; its purpose is to distinguish fully grown oocytes (BCB+) with higher competence from immature ones (BCB–) that are less likely to develop successfully (Wu et al., 2007; Wen et al., 2020).

The degree of cumulus expansion in the cumulus–oocyte complex (COC) is widely used as a morphological indicator during IVM, as more expanded cumulus layers are correlated with higher fertilization and embryo development rates. In addition, gene-expression profiling of cumulus cells has identified non-invasive biomarkers of oocyte competence, including elevated expression of HAS2, GREM1, and PTGS2, which is associated with improved oocyte quality and developmental outcomes (Uyar et al., 2013; Massoud et al., 2024).

Improved Strategies for Enhancing IVM Outcomes

Improving IVM outcomes has been a central focus across species, with efforts directed toward optimizing basal media, supplementing with functional additives, and introducing advanced culture systems (Tonai et al., 2023; Gotschel et al., 2024; Pham et al., 2024). Because oocytes from different species exhibit distinct metabolic requirements, the baseline composition of IVM media varies accordingly. In cattle, sheep, and goats, TCM-199 supplemented with gonadotropins (FSH/LH), estradiol, and growth factors remains the standard (Paramio and Izquierdo, 2014; Arias et al., 2022). In pigs, NCSU-23/37 media, enriched with hypotaurine and taurine, is frequently employed to reduce oxidative stress and improve cytoplasmic maturation (Kim et al., 2004). Mouse oocytes are typically matured in α-MEM or Waymouth medium with cAMP modulators and EGF (Richani et al., 2014). In humans, recent progress has been achieved with biphasic “CAPA-IVM” systems, where C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) is used during a pre-IVM phase to maintain meiotic arrest, followed by conventional IVM for maturation (Gilchrist and Smitz, 2023). Together, these developments highlight the need for species-specific tailoring of basal media to reflect intrinsic follicular physiology (summarized in Table 2).

Table 2.

Basal media, supplements, and outcomes of in vitro oocyte maturation across species.

Species Basal medium Supplements Main outcomes
Cattle TCM-199 + FSH/LH, E2, 
growth factors
Antioxidants (cysteamine, 
polyphenols); EGF, IGF1, FGF2
High MII rates, improved blastocyst quality
Sheep TCM-199 + r-FSH/r-LH, E2, 
cysteamine
Gonadotropins, antioxidants Development to transferable blastocysts
Goat TCM-199 + CNP pre-IVM, 
AREG/PGE2
Pre-IVM CNP; growth factors Improved SCNT embryo competence
Pig NCSU-23/37 
(taurine, hypotaurine)
Melatonin, resveratrol, antioxidants Reduced ROS, higher GSH, 
increased MII and blastocyst rates
Mouse α-MEM/Waymouth + 
IBMX/dbcAMP, EGF
cAMP modulators, roscovitine, 
antioxidants
Improved meiotic synchronization, 
better embryo development
Human CAPA-IVM 
(CNP/NPPC pre-IVM → IVM)
Follicular fluid, 
cumulus-conditioned medium
Improved maturation rates, fertilization, 
safer ART application

CNP, C-type natriuretic peptide; IVM, in vitro maturation; SCNT, somatic cell nuclear transfer; GSH, glutathione; ART, assisted reproductive technology.

A major strategy for enhancing IVM has been the supplementation of culture systems with antioxidants and signaling molecules. Melatonin has been consistently shown to improve MII rates, reduce ROS levels, and increase blastocyst development in porcine oocytes through MT2 receptor-mediated mechanisms (Yang et al., 2020; Zhong et al., 2025). Similarly, resveratrol improves nuclear maturation and blastocyst quality under heat stress in pigs, acting via SIRT1 upregulation and redox balance restoration (Tatone et al., 2018; Meng et al., 2023). In cattle, antioxidant supplementation, including cysteamine and polyphenols, improves GSH levels and reduces ROS, thereby enhancing developmental competence, although concentration-dependent toxic effects have also been reported (Rakha et al., 2022). Manipulation of cyclic nucleotide signaling is another effective approach. In mice, pre-IVM with IBMX or dbcAMP stabilizes GV arrest, prevents premature meiotic resumption, and improves downstream competence (Wu et al., 2020).

Co-culture approaches represent another line of improvement. In humans, three-dimensional co-culture of COCs provides a more physiologic environment than simple monolayer systems, leading to better maturation and embryo outcomes (Combelles et al., 2005). In large domestic animals, granulosa or oviductal epithelial cells have been employed to provide paracrine factors that enhance cytoplasmic maturation, as demonstrated in equine (Zhu et al., 2022) and bovine models (Konishi et al., 1996; Zhu et al., 2022). Supplementation with follicular fluid or cumulus-conditioned medium improved maturation rates and embryo quality in human PCOS patients (Madkour et al., 2018).

Microfluidic culture platforms are emerging as promising tools to improve IVM by reproducing dynamic in vivo environments. In mice, microfluidic IVM systems improved fertilization and blastocyst development compared to static culture (Smith and Takayama, 2007; Mastrorocco et al., 2022; Alegretti et al., 2024). These approaches may become integral to standard IVM pipelines as scalability and reproducibility improve.

Finally, omics-based approaches have begun to uncover predictive biomarkers of oocyte competence, extending the evidence from cumulus cell gene expression to transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic signatures that can more precisely capture the molecular state of the maturing oocyte. In cattle, proteomic analysis of cumulus cells revealed metabolic and stress-related pathways associated with oocyte competence (Uhde et al., 2018). Non-invasive metabolomic profiling of spent culture media and single-cell RNA-seq of oocytes are also being developed, providing real-time indicators of IVM quality (Kassim et al., 2025; Peserico et al., 2025). Overall, these developments show that improving IVM results requires a combination of better culture chemistry, improved physical culture conditions, and reliable biomarkers for selecting high-quality oocytes.

Integrated Protocols of IVM and Oocyte Cryopreservation in Reproductive Biotechnology

Oocyte cryopreservation helps solve practical problems such as distance between herds, transport of genetic material, and mismatched breeding seasons in farm animals. As a result, it improves the efficiency of IVP. The combination of IVM and oocyte freezing, mainly through ultra-rapid vitrification, has become widely used in modern reproductive biology. This approach provides safer and more flexible procedures in both human ART and animal breeding programs.

Conventional in vivo maturation requires high doses of hormone injections, which can increase the risk of OHSS, especially in patients with PCOS. IVM-cryopreservation procedures avoid heavy hormone treatment and therefore help prevent OHSS. They also reduce the cost of hormone drugs and limit the need for repeated hospital visits and monitoring (Son et al., 2019).

In animal science, IVM and cryopreservation are essential tools for large-scale germplasm management and the advancement of genetic technologies. Long-term conservation of female genetic resources via oocyte banking provides useful insurance for breeding programs and for preserving genetic diversity, especially in small or endangered populations (Ríos et al., 2025). The ability to reliably cryopreserve IVM-derived oocytes provides a steady, accessible supply of recipient cells necessary for advanced biotechnologies. These techniques include SCNT, cloning, and the production of genetically modified livestock via genome editing, which often requires a consistent, high-quality oocyte source (Park et al., 2015; Moawad et al., 2018).

Successful clinical use of oocyte freezing required replacing slow-freezing with rapid cooling methods, because rapid cooling reduces cold injury and damage to the fragile MII spindle. Studies also show that the timing of freezing is very important for preserving developmental potential (Vajta, 2000). Vitrification of MII oocytes after the completion of IVM (IVM → vitrification) is significantly more efficient than attempting IVM after warming GV-stage oocytes (vitrification → IVM). The lower success of the second method is mainly due to poor cytoplasmic maturation after warming. Even if GV-stage oocytes survive the freezing and warming steps, the cytoplasm often cannot carry out the metabolic and structural changes needed to support normal development. Therefore, completing cytoplasmic maturation before freezing is essential for maintaining oocyte competence (Fasano et al., 2012).

The disparity in success between human ART and livestock reproduction highlights critical species-specific vulnerabilities to cryopreservation, which is rooted in fundamental differences in oocyte physiology. A primary cryoinjury mechanism is chilling injury, which occurs when lipid-containing membranes and intracellular lipid droplets undergo irreversible phase transitions due to rapid cooling. This damage leads to major cellular dysfunction post-warming, and its severity is directly proportional to the cell’s lipid content. Cryo-stress consistently damages the meiotic machinery. Rapid changes in temperature and exposure to cryoprotectants can disrupt microtubules, leading to spindle breakdown and chromosomal displacement. These abnormalities are linked to increased aneuploidy and reduced embryo development (Hwang and Hochi, 2014; Moawad et al., 2018).

A major difficulty in livestock oocyte freezing arises from physical and biochemical features that differ from human and mouse oocytes. For example, pig oocytes are highly sensitive to cooling because they contain large amounts of cytoplasmic lipids. These lipid droplets slow heat movement within the oocyte, increasing the likelihood of cold damage. They also make the cytoplasm thicker, which slows the movement of water out of the cell and cryoprotectants into the cell during freezing. As a result, the inside of the oocyte cools more slowly, even when fast-cooling devices are used, and extra steps are needed to protect the cell (Hwang and Hochi, 2014). Livestock oocytes possess a significantly larger cytoplasmic volume compared with human counterparts. This increases the challenge of regulating osmotic stress, because a larger amount of water and cryoprotectant must be moved across the membrane. The resulting changes in volume place mechanical stress on the cytoskeleton and can further reduce developmental competence. Additionally, the high lipid content causes cytoplasmic darkening in domestic species, making crucial quality control assessments, such as non-invasive visualization of the meiotic spindle via polarized light microscopy, difficult or impossible. This requires the use of more invasive, fixative-dependent diagnostic methods (e.g., fluorescence microscopy), hindering real-time quality assurance and protocol refinement that is standard in human ART.

Applications of IVM-Derived Oocytes in Animal Biotechnology: IVP, SCNT, and Genome Editing

IVM-derived oocytes are now embedded across livestock biotechnology pipelines. In routine IVP, slaughterhouse ovaries or OPU from genetically elite donors supply immature COCs that are matured in vitro, fertilized by IVF or ICSI, and cultured to transferable blastocysts. This approach is standard in cattle and increasingly applied in small ruminants (Ferré et al., 2020).

For SCNT, IVM oocytes are indispensable as recipient cytoplasts. Enucleated MII-stage oocytes provide the reprogramming environment for donor nuclei, and virtually all large-animal SCNT protocols in cattle, pigs, goats, and sheep rely on IVM-derived oocytes. Species-specific refinements in culture media (e.g., SOF/mSOF derivatives) have improved cloning efficiency, but retrospective analyses consistently identify IVM oocyte quality as the primary determinant of developmental outcomes (Campbell et al., 1996a; 1996b; Campbell, 1999).

The most recent application is genome editing, in which IVM is widely used to obtain one-cell zygotes for genetic modification. In this approach, immature oocytes are matured in vitro, fertilized to form zygotes, and then edited by microinjection or electroporation of CRISPR–Cas reagents. In some systems, editing is carried out directly at the MII oocyte stage. This method shortens the generation interval, allows rapid introduction of desired traits, and supports precise allele replacement (Van Eenennaam, 2019; Zhang et al., 2023).

Species-specific applications further illustrate the centrality of IVM. In cattle, limited access to in vivo zygotes necessitates the use of IVM-IVF embryos for editing. Delivery of CRISPR editors by electroporation or microinjection into IVM-IVF zygotes has efficiently introduced targeted variants such as the PMEL coat-color allele, demonstrating on-target accuracy and manageable mosaicism (Wei et al., 2023). Given the long generation interval of cattle, IVM-IVF–based embryo editing remains the most time-efficient route to founder (Wei et al., 2023). In pigs, IVM-derived oocytes underpin both IVP and gene editing; landmark CRISPR/Cas9 studies demonstrated efficient editing in IVM-IVF zygotes that developed into blastocysts and liveborn animals (Gil et al., 2017; Su et al., 2019; Briski et al., 2024). In addition, single-step electroporation of IVM-IVF zygotes has yielded edited embryos at practical efficiencies (Piñeiro-Silva and Gadea, 2025). In small ruminant, gene-edited animals have been generated both by direct microinjection or electroporation into IVM-IVF embryos and by SCNT using edited donor cells (Mahdi et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2024). Taken together these results demonstrated the indispensable role of IVM oocytes as both cytoplast donors and zygote sources.

Conclusion and Future Perspectives

IVM has progressed from a supplementary technique to a widely applied method in both clinical ART and animal biotechnology. In livestock, IVM-derived oocytes are used for IVP, SCNT, and genome editing, allowing routine production of large numbers of embryos. However, differences in developmental competence between in vivo– and in vitro–matured oocytes still exist, mainly due to incomplete cytoplasmic maturation, cytoskeletal instability, and the naturally high lipid content found in many large-animal oocytes.

Future improvement is expected through omics-based biomarkers for oocyte selection, microfluidic and 3D follicle systems that better imitate in vivo environments, and optimized freezing methods for lipid-rich oocytes. Supplementation strategies—such as mitochondria-supporting metabolites, lipid-modifying additives, or cytoskeleton-stabilizing compounds—may further enhance maturation quality, particularly after cytoplasmic maturation. As genome editing becomes increasingly used in agriculture and biomedicine, IVM will continue to play a central role in scalable embryo production. Advances in culture systems and AI-based monitoring are likely to improve practical outcomes such as embryo survival, pregnancy rates, and healthy offspring.

Conflict of Interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgements

Adel R. Moawad is supported by research grants from the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1890 Capacity Building Grant (grant# 2023-38821-39935) and Evans-Allen Capacity Grant (grant# 1025736).

References

1

Alegretti JR, Da Rocha AM, Nogueira-de-Souza NC, Kato N, Barros BC, Motta ELA, Serafini PC, Takayama S, Smith GD. 2024. Controlled dynamic microfluidic culture of murine, bovine, and human embryos improves development: Proof-of-concept studies. Cells 13:2080.

10.3390/cells1324208039768173PMC11674278
2

Almonacid M, Terret ME, Verlhac MH. 2014. Actin-based spindle positioning: New insights from female gametes. Journal of Cell Science 127:477-483.

10.1242/jcs.142711
3

Archer JS, Chang RJ. 2004. Hirsutism and acne in polycystic ovary syndrome. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 18:737-754.

10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.05.007
4

Arias ME, Vargas T, Gallardo V, Aguila L, Felmer R. 2022. Simple and efficient chemically defined in vitro maturation and embryo culture system for bovine embryos. Animals 12:3057.

10.3390/ani1221305736359181PMC9654503
5

Briski O, La Motta GE, Ratner LD, Allegroni FA, Pillado S, Álvarez G, Gutierrez B, Tarragona L, Zaccagnini A, Acerbo M, et al. 2024. Comparison of ICSI, IVF, and in vivo derived embryos to produce CRISPR-Cas9 gene-edited pigs for xenotransplantation. Theriogenology 220:43-55.

10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.02.028
6

Campbell KHS, Loi P, Otaegui PJ, Wilmut I. 1996a. Cell cycle co-ordination in embryo cloning by nuclear transfer. Reviews of Reproduction 1:40-46.

10.1530/ror.0.0010040
7

Campbell KHS, McWhir J, Ritchie WA, Wilmut I. 1996b. Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line. Nature 380:64-66.

10.1038/380064a0
8

Campbell KHS. 1999. Nuclear transfer in farm animal species. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 10:245-252.

10.1006/scdb.1999.0310
9

Cavallari FC, Leal CLV, Zvi R, Hansen PJ. 2019. Effects of melatonin on production of reactive oxygen species and developmental competence of bovine oocytes exposed to heat shock and oxidative stress during in vitro maturation. Zygote 27:180-186.

10.1017/S0967199419000236
10

Chatzimeletiou K, Pappa K, Petrogiannis N, Anifandis G, Chatzovoulou K, Tsakos E, Kolibianakis E, Grimbizis G, Sioga A. 2025. In vitro maturation of oocytes (IVM): Historical landmarks, current status and future perspectives. Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine 71:102-115.

10.1080/19396368.2025.2469574
11

Chian RC, Buckett WM, Tan SL. 2004. In-vitro maturation of human oocytes. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 8:148-166.

10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60511-1
12

Colls P, Escudero T, Fischer J, Cekleniak NA, Ben-Ozer S, Meyer B, Damien M, Grifo JA, Hershlag A, Munné S. 2012. Validation of array comparative genome hybridization for diagnosis of translocations in preimplantation human embryos. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 24:621-629.

10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.02.006
13

Combelles CMH, Cekleniak NA, Racowsky C, Albertini DF. 2002. Assessment of nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation in in-vitro matured human oocytes. Human Reproduction 17:1006-1016.

10.1093/humrep/17.4.1006
14

Combelles CMH, Fissore RA, Albertini DF, Racowsky C. 2005. In vitro maturation of human oocytes and cumulus cells using a co-culture three-dimensional collagen gel system. Human Reproduction 20:1349-1358.

10.1093/humrep/deh750
15

Conti M, Franciosi F. 2018. Acquisition of oocyte competence to develop as an embryo: Integrated nuclear and cytoplasmic events. Human Reproduction Update 24:245-266.

10.1093/humupd/dmx04029432538PMC5907346
16

De Andrade Melo-Sterza F, Poehland R. 2021. Lipid metabolism in bovine oocytes and early embryos under in vivo, in vitro, and stress conditions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:3421.

10.3390/ijms2207342133810351PMC8038040
17

Dvoran M, Nemcova L, Kalous J. 2022. An interplay between epigenetics and translation in oocyte maturation and embryo development: Assisted reproduction perspective. Biomedicines 10:1689.

10.3390/biomedicines1007168935884994PMC9313063
18

Ealy AD, Wooldridge LK, McCoski SR. 2019. BOARD INVITED REVIEW: Post-transfer consequences of in vitro-produced embryos in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 97:2555-2568.

10.1093/jas/skz11630968113PMC6541818
19

Eppig JJ, O’Brien MJ. 1996. Development in vitro of mouse oocytes from primordial follicles. Biology of Reproduction 54:197-207.

10.1095/biolreprod54.1.197
20

Ermisch AF, Wood JR. 2024. Regulation of oocyte mRNA metabolism: A key determinant of oocyte developmental competence. In Molecular Mechanisms Determining Mammalian Oocyte Quality edited by Balboula AZ. pp. 23-46. Springer, Switzerland.

10.1007/978-3-031-55163-5_2
21

Fasano G, Demeestere I, Englert Y. 2012. In-vitro maturation of human oocytes: Before or after vitrification? Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 29:507-512.

10.1007/s10815-012-9751-922476503PMC3370053
22

Feng X, Li C, Zhang H, Zhang P, Shahzad M, Du W, Zhao X. 2024. Heat-stress impacts on developing bovine oocytes: Unraveling epigenetic changes, oxidative stress, and developmental resilience. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25:4808.

10.3390/ijms2509480838732033PMC11084174
23

Ferré LB, Kjelland ME, Strøbech LB, Hyttel P, Mermillod P, Ross PJ. 2020. Review: Recent advances in bovine in vitro embryo production: Reproductive biotechnology history and methods. Animal 14:991-1004.

10.1017/S1751731119002775
24

Ferreira EM, Vireque AA, Adona PR, Meirelles FV, Ferriani RA, Navarro PAAS. 2009. Cytoplasmic maturation of bovine oocytes: Structural and biochemical modifications and acquisition of developmental competence. Theriogenology 71:836-848.

10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.10.023
25

Genicot G, Leroy JLMR, Van Soom A, Donnay I. 2005. The use of a fluorescent dye, Nile red, to evaluate the lipid content of single mammalian oocytes. Theriogenology 63:1181-1194.

10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.06.006
26

Gil MA, Martinez CA, Nohalez A, Parrilla I, Roca J, Wu J, Ross PJ, Cuello C, Izpisua JC, Martinez EA. 2017. Developmental competence of porcine genome-edited zygotes. Molecular Reproduction and Development 84:814-821.

10.1002/mrd.22829
27

Gilchrist RB, Smitz J. 2023. Oocyte in vitro maturation: Physiological basis and application to clinical practice. Fertility and Sterility 119:524-539.

10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.02.010
28

Gotschel F, Sonigo C, Becquart C, Sellami I, Mayeur A, Grynberg M. 2024. New insights on in vitro maturation of oocytes for fertility preservation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25:10605.

10.3390/ijms25191060539408934PMC11477201
29

Hansen PJ. 2009. Effects of heat stress on mammalian reproduction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364:3341-3350.

10.1098/rstb.2009.013119833646PMC2781849
30

Howe K, FitzHarris G. 2013. Recent insights into spindle function in mammalian oocytes and early embryos. Biology of Reproduction 89:71.

10.1095/biolreprod.113.112151
31

Hwang IS, Hochi S. 2014. Recent progress in cryopreservation of bovine oocytes. BioMed Research International 2014:570647.

10.1155/2014/57064724738063PMC3971499
32

Iwasaki W, Yamanaka K, Sugiyama D, Teshima Y, Briones-Nagata MP, Maeki M, Yamashita K, Takahashi M, Miyazaki M. 2018. Simple separation of good quality bovine oocytes using a microfluidic device. Scientific Reports 8:14273.

10.1038/s41598-018-32687-630250059PMC6155318
33

Jiang Y, He Y, Pan X, Wang P, Yuan X, Ma B. 2023. Advances in oocyte maturation in vivo and in vitro in mammals. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24:9059.

10.3390/ijms2410905937240406PMC10219173
34

Jiao GZ, Cao XY, Cui W, Lian HY, Miao YL, Wu XF, Han D, Tan JH. 2013. Developmental potential of prepubertal mouse oocytes is compromised due mainly to their impaired synthesis of glutathione. PLOS ONE 8:e58018.

10.1371/journal.pone.005801823469259PMC3585726
35

Jo YJ, Jang WI, Namgoong S, Kim NH. 2015. Actin-capping proteins play essential roles in the asymmetric division of maturing mouse oocytes. Journal of Cell Science 128:160-170.

10.1242/jcs.163576
36

Kassim Y, Sheng H, Xu G, Jin H, Iqbal T, Elashry M, Zhang K. 2025. Integrated multi-omics analysis reveals key regulators of bovine oocyte maturation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26:3973.

10.3390/ijms2609397340362214PMC12071811
37

Kim H, Lee G, Hyun S, Lee S, Nam D, Jeong Y, Kim S, Kang S, Lee B, Hwang W. 2004. Improved in vitro development of porcine embryos with different energy substrates and serum. Theriogenology 61:1381-1393.

10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.08.012
38

Kirillova A, Smitz JEJ, Sukhikh GT, Mazunin I. 2021. The role of mitochondria in oocyte maturation. Cells 10:2484.

10.3390/cells1009248434572133PMC8469615
39

Konishi M, Aoyagi Y, Takedomi T, Itakura H, Itoh T, Yazawa S. 1996. Presence of granulosa cells during oocyte maturation improved in vitro development of IVM-IVF bovine oocytes that were collected by ultrasound-guided transvaginal aspiration. Theriogenology 45:573-581.

10.1016/0093-691X(95)00404-V
40

Lee J, Kim D, Son J, Kim D, Jeon E, Jung D, Han M, Ha S, Hwang S, Choi I. 2023. Effects of heat stress on conception in Holstein and Jersey cattle and oocyte maturation in vitro. Journal of Animal Science and Technology 65:324-335.

10.5187/jast.2022.e11337093909PMC10119450
41

Lee K, Cho K, Morey R, Cook-Andersen H. 2024. An extended wave of global mRNA deadenylation sets up a switch in translation regulation across the mammalian oocyte-to-embryo transition. Cell Reports 43:113710.

10.1016/j.celrep.2024.11371038306272PMC11034814
42

Lee S, Choi I. 2023. Specc1l deficiency leads to abnormal oocyte meiosis and reduced blastocyst development in mouse. Reproduction 166:349-356.

10.1530/REP-23-0103
43

Leibfried L, First NL. 1979. Characterization of bovine follicular oocytes and their ability to mature in vitro. Journal of Animal Science 48:76-86.

10.2527/jas1979.48176x
44

Lin Y, Li J, Li C, Tu Z, Li S, Li XJ, Yan S. 2022. Application of CRISPR/Cas9 system in establishing large animal models. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 10:919155.

10.3389/fcell.2022.91915535656550PMC9152178
45

Liu Y, Stott R, Regouski M, Fan Z, Perisse IV, Patrick T, Keim J, Meng Q, Polejaeva IA. 2024. A retrospective analysis of sheep generated by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Theriogenology 227:102-111.

10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.07.017
46

Llonch S, Barragán M, Nieto P, Mallol A, Elosua-Bayes M, Lorden P, Ruiz S, Zambelli F, Heyn H, Vassena R, et al. 2021. Single human oocyte transcriptome analysis reveals distinct maturation stage-dependent pathways impacted by age. Aging Cell 20:e13360.

10.1111/acel.1336033908703PMC8135014
47

Lonergan P. 2024. Embryo transfer: Past, present, future – a personal perspective. Animal Reproduction 21:e20240068.

10.1590/1984-3143-ar2024-0068
48

Madkour A, Bouamoud N, Kaarouch I, Louanjli N, Saadani B, Assou S, Aboulmaouahib S, Sefrioui O, Amzazi S, Copin H, et al. 2018. Follicular fluid and supernatant from cultured cumulus-granulosa cells improve in vitro maturation in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Fertility and Sterility 110:710-719.

10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.038
49

Mahdi AK, Medrano JF, Ross PJ. 2022. Single-step genome editing of small ruminant embryos by electroporation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23:10218.

10.3390/ijms23181021836142132PMC9499182
50

Martinez CA, Rizos D, Rodriguez-Martinez H, Funahashi H. 2023. Oocyte-cumulus cells crosstalk: New comparative insights. Theriogenology 205:87-93.

10.1016/j.theriogenology.2023.04.009
51

Massoud G, Spann M, Vaught KC, Das S, Dow M, Cochran R, Baker V, Segars J, Singh B. 2024. Biomarkers assessing the role of cumulus cells on IVF outcomes: A systematic review. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 41:253-275.

10.1007/s10815-023-02984-937947940PMC10894783
52

Mastrorocco A, Cacopardo L, Temerario L, Martino NA, Tridente F, Rizzo A, Lacalandra GM, Robbe D, Carluccio A, Dell’Aquila ME. 2022. Investigating and modelling an engineered millifluidic in vitro oocyte maturation system reproducing the physiological ovary environment in the sheep model. Cells 11:3611.

10.3390/cells1122361136429039PMC9688735
53

Mehlmann LM, Terasaki M, Jaffe LA, Kline D. 1995. Reorganization of the endoplasmic reticulum during meiotic maturation of the mouse oocyte. Developmental Biology 170:607-615.

10.1006/dbio.1995.1240
54

Meng Q, Li J, Wang C, Shan A. 2023. Biological function of resveratrol and its application in animal production: A review. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 14:25.

10.1186/s40104-022-00822-z36765425PMC9921422
55

Meng XQ, Fan HY, Zhong ZS, Zhang G, Li YL, Chen DY, Sun QY. 2004. Localization of γ-tubulin in mouse eggs during meiotic maturation, fertilization, and early embryonic development. Journal of Reproduction and Development 50:97-105.

10.1262/jrd.50.97
56

Moawad AR, Choi I, Zhu J, El-Wishy ABA, Amarnath D, Chen W, Campbell KHS. 2018. Caffeine and oocyte vitrification: Sheep as an animal model. International Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine 6:S41-S48.

10.1016/j.ijvsm.2018.01.00430761320PMC6161861
57

Moor RM, Trounson AO. 1977. Hormonal and follicular factors affecting maturation of sheep oocytes in vitro and their subsequent developmental capacity. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 49:101-109.

10.1530/jrf.0.0490101
58

Nikalayevich E, Zollo N, Verlhac MH. 2025. Impact of organelle architecture on oocyte developmental potential. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 95:102556.

10.1016/j.ceb.2025.102556
59

Paramio MT, Izquierdo D. 2014. Current status of in vitro embryo production in sheep and goats. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 49:37-48.

10.1111/rda.12334
60

Park MJ, Lee SE, Kim EY, Lee JB, Jeong CJ, Park SP. 2015. Effective oocyte vitrification and survival techniques for bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cellular Reprogramming 17:199-210.

10.1089/cell.2014.007225984830PMC4487599
61

Peserico A, Barboni B, Camerano Spelta Rapini C, Di Berardino C, Capacchietti G, Canciello A, Konstantinidou F, Donato M, Stuppia L, Gatta V. 2025. Transcriptomic profile of early antral follicles: Predictive somatic gene markers of oocyte maturation outcome. Cells 14:704.

10.3390/cells1410070440422207PMC12110445
62

Pham HH, Le AH, Nguyen TC, Ma MPQ, Akin N, Pham TD, Nguyen MHN, Le HL, Huynh BG, Smitz J, et al. 2024. Effect of single versus grouped culture of human cumulus–oocyte complexes in PCOS women treated with biphasic in vitro maturation: A sibling oocyte pilot study. Reproductive Medicine and Biology 23:e12587.

10.1002/rmb2.1258738854775PMC11157497
63

Pincus G, Enzmann EV. 1935. The comparative behavior of mammalian eggs in vivo and in vitro : I. The activation of ovarian eggs. Journal of Experimental Medicine 62:665-675.

10.1084/jem.62.5.66519870440PMC2133299
64

Piñeiro-Silva C, Gadea J. 2025. Optimizing gene editing in pigs: The role of electroporation and lipofection. Animal Reproduction Science 278:107874.

10.1016/j.anireprosci.2025.107874
65

Rakha SI, Elmetwally MA, El-Sheikh Ali H, Balboula A, Mahmoud AM, Zaabel SM. 2022. Importance of antioxidant supplementation during in vitro maturation of mammalian oocytes. Veterinary Sciences 9:439.

10.3390/vetsci908043936006354PMC9415395
66

Richani D, Wang X, Zeng HT, Smitz J, Thompson JG, Gilchrist RB. 2014. Pre-maturation with cAMP modulators in conjunction with EGF-like peptides during in vitro maturation enhances mouse oocyte developmental competence. Molecular Reproduction and Development 81:422-435.

10.1002/mrd.22307
67

Ríos GL, Suqueli García MF, Manrique RJ, Buschiazzo J. 2025. Optimization of bovine oocyte cryopreservation: Membrane fusion competence and cell death of linoleic acid-in vitro matured oocytes subjected to vitrification. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 12:1628947.

10.3389/fvets.2025.162894740687088PMC12271868
68

Roth Z. 2021. Heat stress reduces maturation and developmental capacity in bovine oocytes. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 33:66-75.

10.1071/RD20213
69

Siristatidis CS, Maheshwari A, Vaidakis D, Bhattacharya S. 2018. In vitro maturation in subfertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome undergoing assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 11:CD006606.

10.1002/14651858.CD006606.pub430480769PMC6517219
70

Smith GD, Takayama S. 2007. Gamete and embryo isolation and culture with microfluidics. Theriogenology 68:S190-S195.

10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.033
71

Son WY, Henderson S, Cohen Y, Dahan M, Buckett W. 2019. Immature oocyte for fertility preservation. Frontiers in Endocrinology 10:464.

10.3389/fendo.2019.0046431379739PMC6650526
72

Stein P, Schindler K. 2011. Mouse oocyte microinjection, maturation and ploidy assessment. Journal of Visualized Experiments 53:e2851.

10.3791/2851-v
73

Su X, Chen W, Cai Q, Liang P, Chen Y, Cong P, Huang J. 2019. Production of non-mosaic genome edited porcine embryos by injection of CRISPR/Cas9 into germinal vesicle oocytes. Journal of Genetics and Genomics 46:335-342.

10.1016/j.jgg.2019.07.002
74

Szöllösi D, Desmedt V, Crozet N, Brender C. 1988. In vitro maturation of sheep ovarian oocytes. Reproduction Nutrition Development 28:1047-1080.

10.1051/rnd:19880705
75

Tatone C, Di Emidio G, Barbonetti A, Carta G, Luciano AM, Falone S, Amicarelli F. 2018. Sirtuins in gamete biology and reproductive physiology: Emerging roles and therapeutic potential in female and male infertility. Human Reproduction Update 24:267-289.

10.1093/humupd/dmy003
76

Telfer EE, Grosbois J, Odey YL, Rosario R, Anderson RA. 2023. Making a good egg: Human oocyte health, aging, and in vitro development. Physiological Reviews 103:2623-2677.

10.1152/physrev.00032.202237171807PMC10625843
77

Tonai S, Nakanishi T, Yamaoka M, Okamoto A, Shimada M, Yamashita Y. 2023. Pre-culture with transferrin-Fe3+ before in vitro maturation improves the developmental competence of porcine oocytes matured in vitro. Reproductive Medicine and Biology 22:e12529.

10.1002/rmb2.1252937546178PMC10402462
78

Trapphoff T, Heiligentag M, Simon J, Staubach N, Seidel T, Otte K, Fröhlich T, Arnold GJ, Eichenlaub-Ritter U. 2016. Improved cryotolerance and developmental potential of in vitro and in vivo matured mouse oocytes by supplementing with a glutathione donor prior to vitrification. Molecular Human Reproduction 22:867-881.

10.1093/molehr/gaw059
79

Treff NR, Krisher RL, Tao X, Garnsey H, Bohrer C, Silva E, Landis J, Taylor D, Scott RT, Woodruff TK, et al. 2016. Next generation sequencing-based comprehensive chromosome screening in mouse polar bodies, oocytes, and embryos. Biology of Reproduction 94:76.

10.1095/biolreprod.115.13548326911429PMC5974929
80

Uhde K, van Tol HTA, Stout TAE, Roelen BAJ. 2018. Metabolomic profiles of bovine cumulus cells and cumulus-oocyte-complex-conditioned medium during maturation in vitro. Scientific Reports 8:9477.

10.1038/s41598-018-27829-929930262PMC6013446
81

Uyar A, Torrealday S, Seli E. 2013. Cumulus and granulosa cell markers of oocyte and embryo quality. Fertility and Sterility 99:979-997.

10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.12923498999PMC3866131
82

Vajta G. 2000. Vitrification of the oocytes and embryos of domestic animals. Animal Reproduction Science 60-61:357-364.

10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00097-X
83

Van Eenennaam AL. 2019. Application of genome editing in farm animals: Cattle. Transgenic Research 28:93-100.

10.1007/s11248-019-00141-6
84

Voros C, Athanasiou D, Papapanagiotou I, Mavrogianni D, Varthaliti A, Bananis K, Athanasiou A, Athanasiou A, Papadimas G, Gkirgkinoudis A, et al. 2025. Cracking the code of oocyte quality: The oxidative stress link to IVF success. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26:6377.

10.3390/ijms2613637740650156PMC12249650
85

Wai T, Ao A, Zhang X, Cyr D, Dufort D, Shoubridge EA. 2010. The role of mitochondrial DNA copy number in mammalian fertility. Biology of Reproduction 83:52-62.

10.1095/biolreprod.109.08088720130269PMC2888963
86

Wang T, Xu P, Yuan J, Chen H, Guo X, Gao J, Wang Y, Yao D, Li X, Liu B, et al. 2025. Mitochondrial dysfunction in oocytes: Implications for fertility and ageing. Journal of Ovarian Research 18:186.

10.1186/s13048-025-01764-640814060PMC12355882
87

Watson AJ. 2007. Oocyte cytoplasmic maturation: A key mediator of oocyte and embryo developmental competence. Journal of Animal Science 85:E1–E3.

10.2527/jas.2006-432
88

Wei J, Brophy B, Cole SA, Leath S, Oback B, Boch J, Wells DN, Laible G. 2023. Production of light-coloured, low heat-absorbing Holstein Friesian cattle by precise embryo-mediated genome editing. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 36:112-123.

10.1071/RD23163
89

Wen J, Wang GL, Yuan HJ, Zhang J, Xie HL, Gong S, Han X, Tan JH. 2020. Effects of glucose metabolism pathways on nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation of pig oocytes. Scientific Reports 10:2782.

10.1038/s41598-020-59709-632066834PMC7026050
90

Wu XC, Han Z, Hao X, Zhao YT, Zhou CJ, Wen X, Liang CG. 2020. Combined use of dbcAMP and IBMX minimizes the damage induced by a long-term artificial meiotic arrest in mouse germinal vesicle oocytes. Molecular Reproduction and Development 87:262-273.

10.1002/mrd.23315
91

Wu YG, Liu Y, Zhou P, Lan GC, Han D, Miao DQ, Tan JH. 2007. Selection of oocytes for in vitro maturation by brilliant cresyl blue staining: A study using the mouse model. Cell Research 17:722-731.

10.1038/cr.2007.66
92

Yang G, Xin Q, Dean J. 2024. Degradation and translation of maternal mRNA for embryogenesis. Trends in Genetics 40:238-249.

10.1016/j.tig.2023.12.008
93

Yang L, Wang Q, Cui M, Li Q, Mu S, Zhao Z. 2020. Effect of melatonin on the in vitro maturation of porcine oocytes, development of parthenogenetically activated embryos, and expression of genes related to the oocyte developmental capability. Animals 10:209.

10.3390/ani1002020932012669PMC7070577
94

Younis JS, Radin O, Izhaki I, Ben-Ami M. 2009. Does first polar body morphology predict oocyte performance during ICSI treatment? Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 26:561-567.

10.1007/s10815-009-9368-919960239PMC2799563
95

Zhang Y, Yin T, Zhou L. 2023. CRISPR/Cas9 technology: Applications in oocytes and early embryos. Journal of Translational Medicine 21:746.

10.1186/s12967-023-04610-937875936PMC10594749
96

Zhao HC, Ding T, Ren Y, Li TJ, Li R, Fan Y, Yan J, Zhao Y, Li M, Yu Y, et al. 2016. Role of Sirt3 in mitochondrial biogenesis and developmental competence of human in vitro matured oocytes. Human Reproduction 31:607-622.

10.1093/humrep/dev345
97

Zhong J, Lu Z, Zhou Z, Ma N, Li Y, Hu J, Wan B, Lu W. 2025. Melatonin biosynthesis and regulation in reproduction. Frontiers in Endocrinology 16:1630164.

10.3389/fendo.2025.163016440791993PMC12336035
98

Zhu X, Zhao S, Xu S, Zhang D, Zhu M, Pan Q, Huang J. 2022. Granulosa cells improved mare oocyte cytoplasmic maturation by providing collagens. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 10:914735.

10.3389/fcell.2022.91473535846364PMC9280134
페이지 상단으로 이동하기