Management & Economics
Cho SJ, Oh SR, Lee SH. 2019. Impacts of SPS and TBT measures on Korean agricultural exports: An analysis by disaggregated products. Journal of International Trade and Industry Studies 24:1-19.
10.23030/KATIS.2019.24.1.001Gouk SY, Kim JH, Seo DJ, Lee HY, Kim JI, Kim TH, Yu CH, Sim JH, Han IC, Kim SH, et al. 2022. Top 10 Agricultural Policy Issues of 2023. KREI Agri-Policy Focus No. 213. 21 pp. Korea Rural Economic Institute. [in Korean]
Jang YJ, Hyun HJ. 2022. Technical barriers to trade and export of Korea: The role of country and product characteristics. Journal of International Trade and Industry Studies 27:1-28. [in Korean]
10.23030/KATIS.2022.27.4.001Jang YJ, Lee W. 2017. The impact of TBT and SPS on the imports of India. Journal of South Asian Studies 23:79-104. [in Korean]
10.21587/jsas.2017.23.1.004Kang MJ. 2023. Recent Regulatory Trends in Mega FTA SPS Chapters. KIEP Research Paper No. 22-14. 217 pp. Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. [in Korean]
Kang SJ. 2024. Final Agreement on the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF): Analysis of the Projection of the U.S.’s New Trade Paradigm and Its Implications. IFANS Analysis of Major International Issues No. 2024-16. 26 pp. Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security. [in Korean]
Kim JD, Chung MC, Kim JH. 2020. The Status of Non-Tariff Measures in Korea: Focusing on UNCTAD Data. KIEP Basic Data No. 20-02. 17 pp. Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. [in Korean]
Kim JD, Lee CK, Yea SJ, Lee JK, Keum HY. 2023. The Conclusion of IPEF Negotiations: Key Details and Prospects. KIEP World Economy Focus No. 23-44. 11 pp. Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. [in Korean]
Lee SC. 2018. Empirical analysis on the effects of FTAs and FTA spillover on the bilateral trade using GMM, fixed and random panel model, and PPML estimation. International Area Studies Review 22:3-18. [in Korean]
10.21212/IASR.22.2.1Lee W, Lee JM, Kim SJ, Jang YJ. 2016. India’s TBT and SPS: Institutions, Cases and Impact on Exports to India. KIEP Studies in Comprehensive Regional Strategies No. 16-03. 138 pp. Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. [in Korean]
10.2139/ssrn.2945948Li YX, Kim HT. 2019. Analyzing the effect of the Korea-China FTA concluded by using the gravity model on the export of Chinese agricultural products to Korea and drawing out the strategic utilization plan. Journal of Distribution and Management Research 22:185-194. [in Korean]
10.17961/JDMR.22.4.201908.185Mo J. 2022. The impacts of sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures on China’s tea trade: Empirical analysis based on gravity model. Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research 4:870-879.
Park JJ. 2021. An partial equilibrium analysis on industrial trade effects of Korea-ASEAN FTA with structural gravity model. Journal of Korea Research Association of International Commerce 21:137-168. [in Korean]
10.29331/JKRAIC.2021.12.21.6.137Pöyhönen P. 1963. A tentative model for the volume of trade between countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 90:93-100.
Roh JW, Roh JY. 2021. A comparative study on the panel gravity model of Korea trade using machine learning. International Commerce and Information Review 23:55-77. [in Korean]
10.15798/kaici.2021.23.3.55Silva JS, Tenreyro S. 2006. The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics 88:641-658.
10.1162/rest.88.4.641- Publisher :Institute of Agricultural Science, Chungnam National University
- Publisher(Ko) :충남대학교 농업과학연구소
- Journal Title :Korean Journal of Agricultural Science
- Journal Title(Ko) :농업과학연구
- Volume : 52
- No :3
- Pages :247-256
- Received Date : 2025-01-13
- Revised Date : 2025-07-13
- Accepted Date : 2025-07-14
- DOI :https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.520304


Korean Journal of Agricultural Science








