All Issue

2026 Vol.53, Issue 2 Preview Page

Engineering

Rollover stability analysis of a 36.8-kW one-row self-propelled cabbage harvester
Md Razob Ali1
,
Md Nasim Reza12
,
Md Ashikur Rahman2
,
Og Ran Park3
,
Sun-Ok Chung12*
,
Da-Hye Jeong3*
1Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Graduate School, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
2Department of Smart Agricultural Systems, Graduate School, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
3Hyundai Agricultural Machinery Co., Ltd., Iksan 54584, Korea
*Corresponding Author
1 June 2026. pp. 249-268
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Overturning risk and dynamic instability represent major safety concerns for compact self-propelled harvesters operating on uneven agricultural terrain. This study evaluated the stability characteristics of a 36.8 kW one-row self-propelled cabbage harvester through an integrated approach combining numerical simulation, controlled experimental validation, and field inclination monitoring. The harvester center of gravity was determined in accordance with ISO 789-6, and rollover behavior was analyzed for unloaded and loaded (500 kg) conditions using multibody dynamics simulation software. Simulation results were validated through controlled inclination tests conducted at a certified testing facility. To evaluate dynamic stability in real harvesting operations, digital inclinometers were mounted on the harvesting unit and the main structural frame, and inclination responses were recorded and analyzed in the time domain to characterize longitudinal and lateral behavior. The simulation results indicated that lateral overturning limit angles (30.07 - 38.23°) were consistently higher than longitudinal limits (17.94 - 27.92°). Adding a 500 kg payload reduced overturning angles by up to 20 - 25%, with the largest reductions occurring in the forward and rearward directions. Inclination experiments produced lower absolute overturning angles than the simulations but showed consistent directional trends, supporting the validity of the simulation-based assessment. Field measurements revealed greater longitudinal inclination variability at the harvesting unit (mean = 5.22°; root mean square [RMS] = 7.41°) than at the main structural frame (mean = 7.01°; RMS = 7.91°), whereas lateral inclination responses remained small for both components (RMS < 3.08°). Transient inclination peaks were associated with localized terrain irregularities; however, these events were short in duration and did not indicate sustained dynamic instability. The results demonstrate that payload loading primarily degrades longitudinal stability, while the tracked undercarriage contributes to maintaining lateral stability. The proposed combined evaluation framework provides a practical and reliable method for assessing rollover stability and in-field dynamic behavior of cabbage harvesters under realistic operating conditions.

Keywords
agricultural machinery
cabbage harvester
center of gravity
inclination
rollover behavior
References
1

Ali M, Haque MA, Rahman MA, Moon JM, Kim KJ, Chung SO, Kim HI. 2024. Mechanization trends of cabbage harvesting practices: A review. Precision Agriculture Science and Technology 6:218-237.

10.22765/PASTJ.20240016
2

Ali M, Lee YS, Chowdhury M, Khan NA, Swe KM, Rasool K, Kabir MSN, Lee DH, Chung SO. 2021. Analysis of driving stability and vibration of a 20-kW self-propelled 1-row Chinese cabbage harvester. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 46:48-59.

10.1007/s42853-021-00087-w
3

Ali MR, Reza MN, Rahman MA, Jeong DH, Park OR, Chung SO, Jeong K. 2025. Structural analysis of key power transmission components of a 36.8-kW 1-row self-propelled cabbage harvester. Precision Agriculture Science and Technology 7:337-354.

10.22765/pastj.20250023
4

Bekker MG. 1956. Theory of Land Locomotion. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.

10.3998/mpub.9690401
5

Bendat JS, Piersol AG. 2011. Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.

10.1002/9781118032428
6

Carabin G, Karaca M, Mazzetto F. 2025. Preliminary results of extensive tractor rollover stability tests using a tilting-rotating rig. Biosystems Engineering 254:104146.

10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2025.104146
7

Chang YT, Chang H, Zehetner F. 2014. Evaluation of phytoavailability of heavy metals to Chinese cabbage (Brassica chinensis L.) in rural soils. The Scientific World Journal 2014:309396.

10.1155/2014/30939625295297PMC4176922
8

Chen Y, Wang Z, Zhang H, Liu X, Li H, Sun W, Li H. 2024. Investigation of the traveling performance of the tracked chassis of a potato combine harvester in hilly and mountainous areas. Agriculture 14:1625.

10.3390/agriculture14091625
9

Chowdhury M, Islam MN, Iqbal MZ, Islam S, Lee DH, Kim DG, Jun HJ, Chung SO. 2020. Analysis of overturning and vibration during field operation of a tractor-mounted 4-row radish collector toward ensuring user safety. Machines 8:77.

10.3390/machines8040077
10

Czechowicz MP, Mavros G. 2014. Analysis of vehicle rollover dynamics using a high-fidelity model. Vehicle System Dynamics 52:608-636.

10.1080/00423114.2013.863362
11

Dassault Systèmes. 2020. SOLIDWORKS 2020. Waltham, MA: Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks Corp.

12

Du D, Wang J, Xie L, Deng F. 2019. Design and field test of a new compact self-propelled cabbage harvester. Transactions of the ASABE 62:1243-1250.

10.13031/trans.13327
13

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2023. FAOSTAT statistical database: Crops and livestock products (cabbages and other brassicas, item code 358). Accessed in https://www.fao.org/faostat on 30 May 2025.

14

Franceschetti B, Lenain R, Rondelli V. 2014. Comparison between a rollover tractor dynamic model and actual lateral tests. Biosystems Engineering 127:79-91.

10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.08.010
15

FunctionBay. 2025. RecurDyn 2025. Seongnam, Korea: FunctionBay, Inc.

16

Gao J, Yin C, Yuan G. 2022. Warning and active steering rollover prevention control for agricultural wheeled tractor. PLoS ONE 17:e0280021.

10.1371/journal.pone.028002136584206PMC9803282
17

Gillespie TD. 2021. Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics. SAE International, Warrendale, PA.

10.4271/9781468601770
18

Han J, Wang Y, Sun C. 2023. A method for analysing the lateral stability of wheeled farm tractors by obstacles on slopes. International Journal of Vehicle Design 91:289-302.

10.1504/IJVD.2023.131209
19

Huang W, Xu F, Ge J, Zhang C. 2012. Simulated analysis of a wheeled tractor on soft soil based on RecurDyn. In Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture V edited by Li D, Chen Y. pp. 332-342. Springer, Germany.

10.1007/978-3-642-27275-2_38
20

Hwang SJ, Jang MK, Nam JS. 2021. Application of lateral overturning and backward rollover analysis in a multi-purpose agricultural machine developed in South Korea. Agronomy 11:297.

10.3390/agronomy11020297
21

ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 1982. ISO 789-6. Agricultural tractors — Test procedures — Part 6: Centre of gravity. ISO, Switzerland.

22

Jang MK, Hwang SJ, Kim JH, Nam JS. 2022a. Overturning and rollover characteristics of a tractor through dynamic simulations: Effect of slope angle and obstacles on a hard surface. Biosystems Engineering 219:11-24.

10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2022.04.017
23

Jang MK, Hwang SJ, Nam JS. 2022b. Simulation study for overturning and rollover characteristics of a tractor with an implement on a hard surface. Agronomy 12:3093.

10.3390/agronomy12123093
24

Jang MK, Kim SJ, Shin BS, Nam JS. 2024. Lateral overturning and backward rollover of agricultural tractors: A review. Agriculture 14:334.

10.3390/agriculture14030334
25

Janosi Z, Hanamoto B. 1961. The analytical determination of drawbar pull as a function of slip for tracked vehicles in deformable soils. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on the Mechanics of Soil-Vehicle Systems. pp. 707-726. Italy: Politecnico di Torino.

26

Jazar RN. 2025. Vehicle Dynamics: Theory and Application. Springer, Switzerland.

10.1007/978-3-031-74458-7
27

Karaca M, Carabin G, Mazzetto F. 2026. Evaluating implement-induced CoG shifts on tractor rollover stability: A multibody dynamics and experimental study across different machine orientations. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 240:111174.

10.1016/j.compag.2025.111174
28

Kim GY, Park WK, Jeong HC, Lee SI, Choi EJ, Kim PJ, Seo YH, Na US. 2015. A revised estimate of N2O emission factor for spring Chinese cabbage fields in Korea. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 17:326-332. [in Korean]

10.5532/KJAFM.2015.17.4.326
29

Kim WS, Siddique MAA, Kim YJ, Jung YJ, Baek SM, Baek SY, Lim RG. 2022. Simulation of the rollover angle of a self-propelled radish harvester for different load conditions. Applied Sciences 12:10733.

10.3390/app122110733
30

Liu J, Ayers PD. 1999. Off-road vehicle rollover and field testing of stability index. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health 5:59-72.

10.13031/2013.5700
31

Liu Z, Mao H, Wang Y, Jiang T, Zuo Z, Chai J, Liu C, Shen L, Wei S, Ma G. 2025. Design and experiment of a universal harvesting platform for cabbage and Chinese cabbage. Agriculture 15:935.

10.3390/agriculture15090935
32

Majdan R, Abrahám R, Tkáč Z, Drlička R, Matejková E, Kollárová K, Mareček J. 2021. Static lateral stability of tractor with rear wheel ballast weights: Comparison of ISO 16231-2 (2015) with experimental data regarding tyre deformation. Applied Sciences 11:381.

10.3390/app11010381
33

Mizushima A, Ishii K, Noguchi N, Matsuo Y, Lu R. 2011. Development of a low-cost attitude sensor for agricultural vehicles. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 76:198-204.

10.1016/j.compag.2011.01.017
34

NI. 2020. LabVIEW 2020. Austin, TX: National Instruments Corp.

35

Radzajewski P, Guzek M. 2021. Braking of the tractor-semi-trailer set in a rectilinear motion. WUT Journal of Transportation Engineering 133:39-58.

10.5604/01.3001.0015.6499
36

Reynolds SJ, Groves W. 2000. Effectiveness of roll-over protective structures in reducing farm tractor fatalities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 18:63-69.

10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00142-2
37

Reza MN, Karim MR, Ali MR, Lee KH, Bicamumakuba E, Lee KY, Chung SO. 2025. Field evaluation of a transplanter and a collector under development for Korean spring cabbage production in greenhouses. AgriEngineering 7:226.

10.3390/agriengineering7070226
38

Viganico CEH, Drehmer LRC, Casas WJP. 2025. Safety assessment of a tractor semi-trailer based on handling and stability maneuvers. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering [Online First]. doi:10.1177/09544070251355301

10.1177/09544070251355301
39

Wang L, Liu F, Song Z, Ni Y, He Z, Zhai Z, Li Z. 2024. Advances in tractor rollover and stability control: Implications for off-road driving safety. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 226:109483.

10.1016/j.compag.2024.109483
40

Wong JY. 2010. Theory of Ground Vehicles (4th). John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.

41

Zhou CK, Huang YY, Ni L. 2014. The dynamics simulation of tracked vehicles on the hard and soft ground based on the RecurDyn. Advanced Materials Research 842:351-354.

10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.842.351
Information
  • Publisher :Institute of Agricultural Science, Chungnam National University
  • Publisher(Ko) :충남대학교 농업과학연구소
  • Journal Title :Korean Journal of Agricultural Science
  • Journal Title(Ko) :농업과학연구
  • Volume : 53
  • No :2
  • Pages :249-268
  • Received Date : 2026-02-12
  • Revised Date : 2026-05-09
  • Accepted Date : 2026-05-13
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.530211
Journal Informaiton Korean Journal of Agricultural Science Korean Journal of Agricultural Science
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • crossref funder-registry
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close