Animal

Korean Journal of Agricultural Science. 1 December 2024. 477-483
https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.510406

ABSTRACT


MAIN

  • Introduction

  • Materials and Methods

  •   Experimental design

  •   Sample collection and analysis

  •   Statistical analysis

  • Results

  •   The effect of probiotics as spraying agent in slurry

  •   The effect of probiotics as spraying agent in pig house

  • Discussion

  • Conclusion

Introduction

The emission of harmful gases from intensive farming is a significant higher and becomes. one of the reasons for the increase in global temperatures and the greenhouse effect (Marszałek et al., 2018). With the increased degree of intensive farming, nowadays the accumulation of large quantities of faecal slurry in pig sheds produce more harmful gases which in turn pollute the environment (Wang et al., 2009; Yan et al., 2010; Jeong and Kim, 2014; Calvet et al., 2017). Studies have shown that animal husbandry emissions account for 14.5% of total emissions, making it the second-highest contributor (Giraldi-Díaz et al., 2021; Twine, 2021). Furthermore, the noxious gases generated in pigsties can adversely impact the health and growth of pigs (Michiels et al., 2015). Additionally, improper handling of faecal slurry can be hazardous to public health (Sun et al., 2021).

Among many probiotic bacteria, Bacillus has been reported to show the greatest promise as a live-fed microorganism due to their inherent ability to withstand severe environmental stress and change during storage and handling (Upadhaya et al., 2019). Available research shows that Bacillus spp. is beneficial in growth performance and decrease gas emmision (Sureshkumar et al., 2022). According to a 2013 study by Bellot et al. (2013) bedding of animals (horses, guinea pigs, and cows) with Bacillus strains of probiotics reduced the unpleasant odor of animal feces.

The decomposition of proteins in faecal slurry is the primary cause of the production of noxious gases. Studies have shown that feeding pigs probiotics can reduce harmful gas emissions. Recently, our laboratory has discovered that applying probiotics to faecal slurry through spraying reveal more effective strategy to reduce harmful emissions. However, they use only one particular strain probiotic. Herein, we focus to use mixed probiotic (Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus plantarum) and examine how effectively these strains could help to supress the odor from pig slurry and barn.

Materials and Methods

Experimental design

Two finishing pig (n = 150 head per room) rooms were selected at first. One house was named as control (CON) and probiotic (PRO) for a period of 3 weeks all pigs were allowed to fed corn-soybean meal diet (formulated according to NRC, 2012) and free access to water. The CON room was sprayed with saline water, while PRO room was sprayed with mixed probiotics (Bacillus subtilis (1.0 × 107 cfu·g-1) and Bacillus licheniformis (1.0 × 107 cfu·g-1) in a 1 : 1 mixture). Spraying was done twice a day at 8 am and 8 pm. The underfloor cesspit is 0.45 m deep and has an area of 22.8 m2. Control of room temperature at 18 - 21℃ and humidity at 60% through environmental control settings.

Sample collection and analysis

Faecal slurry samples were collected from eight evenly spaced points within the pig house cesspools on days 0, 7, 14 and 21, and stored in 2.6 L plastic airtight container and incubated at room temperature for 24 h before determining the harmful gas concentration. Finally, NH3, H2S, methyl mercaptans, acetic acid, and CO2 contents were determined using a multi-gas detector (Multi-RAE Lite, RAE Systems, USA).

Statistical analysis

All data obtained were analysed using the t-test procedure in SAS 9.3 (SAS, 2014). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

The effect of probiotics as spraying agent in slurry

Fig. 1 showed that the effect of microbial spraying agent in slurry. The application of mixed probiotics through spraying significantly mitigated H2S emission from the slurry on day 7, 14 and 21 (p < 0.05). Moreover, spraying a mixture of probiotics significantly reduced the elevated concentrations of methyl mercaptans, acetic acid, and CO2 in slurry on day 7, 14 and 21 (p < 0.05).

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjoas/2024-051-04/N0030510406/images/kjoas_2024_514_477_F1.jpg
Fig. 1.

Effect of spraying mixed probiotics on noxious gas emission in slurry. A, NH3; B, H2S; C, methyl mercaptans; D, acetic acid; E, CO2. * means differ significantly (p < 0.05).

The effect of probiotics as spraying agent in pig house

Fig. 2 demonstrate a decreasing trend in gas emissions in the pig house after probiotic spraying. Airborne concentrations of NH3 were significantly reduced on days 14 and 24, while H2S and methyl mercaptans were significantly reduced on day 21. Additionally, acetic acid and CO2 concentrations were significantly reduced on days 7, 14, and 21 in the pig house (p < 0.05).

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjoas/2024-051-04/N0030510406/images/kjoas_2024_514_477_F2.jpg
Fig. 2.

Effect of spraying mixed probiotics on noxious gas emission in pig house. A, NH3; B, H2S; C, methyl mercaptans; D, acetic acid; E, CO2. * means differ significantly (p < 0.05).

Discussion

NH3 in piggeries is primarily produced from urea in contact with urease (Van Kempen, 2001). H2S is a chemically unstable reducing agent that oxidises easily and produces toxic substances when burned. NH3 and H2S are both harmful gases with unpleasant odours (Habeeb et al., 2018). Excessive emissions of these gases can cause respiratory illness and acidification of ecosystems (Wu et al., 2020). Methyl mercaptan has a disagreeable odour that can cause discomfort, although it does not have any apparent pathological characteristics when inhaled (Luttrell and Bobo, 2015). Excessive emissions of acetic acid can cause environmental acidification and strongly irritate and damage the human respiratory tract (Ernstgård et al., 2006). Although carbon dioxide is a colourless and odourless gas, excessive emissions can cause nitrogen and oxygen toxicity in animals, as well as contribute to the greenhouse effect (Sawyer, 1972; Langford, 2005). Odours from farms are primarily produced by the microbiological transformation of organic matter from the gastrointestinal tracts of animals, manure pits, and floors (Hamon et al., 2012). Therefore, adding probiotics to reduce the concentration of harmful gas-producing microorganisms could be a potential method for decreasing gas emissions. Several studies have demonstrated this fact. Bacillus, Lactobacillus, and Yeast can reduce harmful emissions from pig manure. The addition of probiotics to the diet has been demonstrated to significantly reduce the excretion of nitrogen in faeces, thereby reducing the production of noxious gases. This is evidenced by studies which have shown that odorous compounds are produced mainly due to microbial fermentation of undigested proteins excreted from the gastrointestinal tract through anaerobic fermentation. Furthermore, certain probiotics are employed in the composting of manure with the objective of accelerating the fermentation process. Consequently, the present study sought to ascertain the impact of incorporating probiotics directly into the slurry on the emission of noxious gases from the slurry. Although previous studies have demonstrated that the application of probiotics to manure slurry can result in a reduction in the production of harmful gases, Nevertheless, the efficacy of employing distinct probiotic strains remains to be determined (Kim et al., 2014; Muhizi and Kim, 2022).

The breakdown of urea nitrogen in urine by urease-producing bacteria such as Bacteriodes, Bifidobacteria, and Proteus is followed by its conversion to NH3 and CO2 by contact with bacteria in faeces. Consequently, the reduction of ammonia levels and the inhibition of bacteria that produce harmful gases represent crucial elements in the reduction of harmful emissions. The results of this study showed that spraying mixed Bacillus probiotics in manure slurry reduced the concentration of harmful gases in manure slurry (Muhizi and Kim, 2022). It could be a difference in the concentration of probiotics used as well as differences in house conditions. In addition, the use of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens alone on faecal slurry after treatment in the fermenter reduced the production of noxious gases from the slurry, which is consistent with the results of this study (Kim et al., 2014). In addition, this study was conducted in an actual farming environment where probiotic treatment was carried out, allowing for a more realistic collection of results of probiotic treatment of faecal slurry. We can see from the trend of the graphic curve that spraying a mixture of probiotics reduces more the amount of H2S, as well as the concentration of methyl mercaptans, acetic acid and CO2 in the faecal slurry. It can be concluded that the levels of harmful gases in the unsprayed mixed probiotic group showed an increasing trend with time, while the spraying of the mixed probiotic significantly reduced the levels of harmful gases in the air and showed a decreasing trend. Although the results of this study demonstrated similar trends to those observed in previous studies, the reduction in harmful gases was not as pronounced. Previous studies have demonstrated that Bacillus subtilis produces antimicrobials that reduce the number of ammonia-producing bacteria in faeces (Lisboa et al., 2006). Furthermore, Bacillus spp. sensors produce organic acids with the effect of lowering the pH of the faecal slurry, thereby reducing nitrogen deamination (Wang et al., 2009). It is widely accepted that Bacillus spp. have the ability to hydrolyse proteins, as they produce a multitude of hydrolases to degrade a diverse range of substrates. Furthermore, Bacillus spp. has been demonstrated to be an effective agent for the removal of H2S (Arakawa et al., 2000). This may be the reason why a reduction in harmful emissions was observed in this study.

In summary, the gradual reduction of harmful gases in the air may be due to the fact that the spraying of mixed probiotics in the faecal slurry is effective in reducing the content of harmful gases in the slurry, which leads to a lower degree of volatilisation due to a lower concentration.

Conclusion

Spraying a 1 : 1 mixture of Bacillus subtilis (1.0 × 107 cfu·g-1) and Bacillus licheniformis (1.0 × 107 cfu·g-1) at a concentration of 500 g per tonne in the slurry of the pig house would be better option to reduce the gas harmful from pig slurry and barn. We believe that our result would provide a novel insight to use probiotic as spraying agent to improve the air quality and reduce the environmental pollution.

Conflict of Interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1

Arakawa T, Ishikawa Y, Ushida K. 2000. Volatile sulfur production by pig cecal bacteria in batch culture and screening inhibitors of sulfate reducing bacteria. Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology 46:193-198.

10.3177/jnsv.46.19311185657
2

Bellot MC, Mertz KJ, Rehberger TG. 2013. Bacillus strains useful for animal odor control. U.S. Patent No. 8025874B2.

3

Calvet S, Hunt J, Misselbrook TH. 2017. Low frequency aeration of pig slurry affects slurry characteristics and emissions of greenhouse gases and ammonia. Biosystems Engineering 159:121-132.

10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.04.01128713224PMC5492791
4

Ernstgård L, Iregren A, Sjögren B, Johanso G. 2006. Acute effects of exposure to vapours of acetic acid in humans. Toxicology Letters 165:22-30.

10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.01.01016490326
5

Giraldi-Díaz MR, Castillo-González E, De Medina-Salas L, Velásquez-De la Cruz R, Huerta-Silva HD. 2021. Environmental impacts associated with intensive production in pig farms in Mexico through life cycle assessment. Sustainability 13:11248.

10.3390/su132011248
6

Habeeb OA, Kanthasamy R, Ali GAM, Sethupathi S, Yunus RBM. 2018. Hydrogen sulfide emission sources, regulations, and removal techniques: A review. Reviews in Chemical Engineering 34:837-854.

10.1515/revce-2017-0004
7

Hamon L, Andrès Y, Dumont E. 2012. Aerial pollutants in swine buildings: A review of their characterization and methods to reduce them. Environmental Science & Technology 46:12287-12301.

10.1021/es302575823127202
8

Jeong JS, Kim IH. 2014. Effect of Bacillus subtilis C-3102 spores as a probiotic feed supplement on growth performance, noxious gas emission, and intestinal microflora in broilers. Poultry Science 93:3097-3103.

10.3382/ps.2014-0408625260523
9

Kim YJ, Ahmed ST, Islam MM, Yang CJ. 2014. Evaluation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as manure additive for control of odorous gas emissions from pig slurry. African Journal of Microbiology Research 8:2540-2546.

10.5897/AJMR2014.6742
10

Langford NJ. 2005. Carbon dioxide poisoning. Toxicological Reviews 24:229-235.

10.2165/00139709-200524040-0000316499405
11

Lisboa MP, Bonatto D, Bizani D, Henriques JAP, Brandelli A. 2006. Characterization of a bacteriocin-like substance produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens isolated from the Brazilian Atlantic forest. International Microbiology 9:111-118.

16835841
12

Luttrell WE, Bobo ME. 2015. Methyl mercaptan. Journal of Chemical Health & Safety 22:37-39.

10.1016/j.jchas.2015.07.009
13

Marszałek M, Kowalski Z, Makara A. 2018. Emission of greenhouse gases and odorants from pig slurry - Effect on the environment and methods of its reduction. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S 25:383-394.

10.1515/eces-2018-0026
14

Michiels A, Piepers S, Ulens T, Van Ransbeeck N, Del Pozo Sacristán R, Sierens A, Haesebrouck F, Demeyer P, Maes D. 2015. Impact of particulate matter and ammonia on average daily weight gain, mortality and lung lesions in pigs. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 121:99-107.

10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.06.01126148844
15

Muhizi S, Kim IH. 2022. Microbial agent spraying in pig housing and slurry can potentially reduce harmful gas emissions - A preliminary study. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 32:26-33.

10.22358/jafs/154037/2022
16

NRC (National Research Council). 2012. Nutrient Requirements of Swine (11th revised). National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., USA.

17

SAS. 2014. Statistical Analysis System. Ver. 9.3. Raleigh, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.

18

Sawyer JS. 1972. Man-made carbon dioxide and the "Greenhouse" effect. Nature 239:23-26.

10.1038/239023a0
19

Sun L, Long M, Li J, Wu R, Ma L, Tang D, Lu Y, Wang Z. 2021. Different effects of thermophilic microbiological inoculation with and without biochar on physicochemical characteristics and bacterial communities in pig manure composting. Frontiers in Microbiology 12:746718.

10.3389/fmicb.2021.74671834899633PMC8660119
20

Sureshkumar S, Park JH, Kim IH. 2022. A preliminary evaluation on mixed probiotics as an antimicrobial spraying agent in growing pig barn. Journal of Animal Science and Technology 64:1035-1045.

10.5187/jast.2022.e6936812037PMC9890338
21

Twine R. 2021. Emissions from animal agriculture-16.5% is the new minimum figure. Sustainability 13:6276.

10.3390/su13116276
22

Upadhaya SD, Rudeaux F, Kim IH. 2019. Efficacy of dietary Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis supplementation continuously in pullet and lay period on egg production, excreta microflora, and egg quality of Hyline-Brown birds. Poultry Science 98:4722-4728.

10.3382/ps/pez18431065703
23

Van Kempen TATG. 2001. Dietary adipic acid reduces ammonia emission from swine excreta. Journal of Animal Science 79:2412-2417.

10.2527/2001.7992412x11583428
24

Wang Y, Cho JH, Chen YJ, Yoo JS, Huang Y, Kim HJ, Kim IH. 2009. The effect of probiotic BioPlus 2B® on growth performance, dry matter and nitrogen digestibility and slurry noxious gas emission in growing pigs. Livestock Science 120:35-42.

10.1016/j.livsci.2008.04.018
25

Wu C, Yang F, Brancher M, Liu J, Qu C, Piringer M, Schauberger G. 2020. Determination of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions from a commercial dairy farm with an exercise yard and the health-related impact for residents. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27:37684-37698.

10.1007/s11356-020-09858-y32608005PMC7496066
26

Yan L, Wang JP, Kim HJ, Meng QW, Ao X, Hong SM, Kim IH. 2010. Influence of essential oil supplementation and diets with different nutrient densities on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, meat quality and fecal noxious gas content in grower-finisher pigs. Livestock Science 128:115-122.

10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.008
페이지 상단으로 이동하기