Animal

Korean Journal of Agricultural Science. 1 September 2025. 279-288
https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.520307

ABSTRACT


MAIN

  • Introduction

  • Materials and Methods

  •   Phenotype data

  •   Genotype data

  •   Statistical analysis

  • Results

  • Discussion

  • Conclusion

Introduction

Marbling is one of the most critical indicators of beef quality and various countries have established marbling-based standards for evaluating meat quality grades. In premium beef markets, such as Korea and Japan, where consumers prefer richly marbled meat, interest has grown not only in the amount of marbling but also in its visual characteristics—specifically, finely distributed, small flecks of intramuscular fat rather than coarse clumps (Hocquette et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2025).

Highly marbled beef contains elevated levels of monounsaturated fatty acids, particularly oleic acid, which is associated with more favorable blood lipid profiles than saturated fats (Hocquette et al., 2010; Smith, 2016). However, concerns about excessive fat intake among health-conscious consumers have increased demand for beef with fine and evenly distributed marbling (Kris-Etherton et al., 1999; WHO, 2003; Lee et al., 2025).

Image analysis has been widely adopted to objectively assess marbling fineness (MF). In Japanese Black cattle, for example, cross-sectional images of the longissimus dorsi muscle are captured using imaging devices, and marbling particles were analyzed to evaluate their coarseness and fineness (Kuchida et al., 2006; Kuchida and Kanai, 2012).

Recently, an image-based index known as the F7 index was developed to quantify MF in Hanwoo cattle (Lee et al., 2020; 2025). In this study, we utilized the F7 index to estimate the genetic parameters of MF and evaluated its potential as a novel trait by estimating genomic breeding values and their prediction accuracies. This approach reflects the growing consumer interest in not only the quantity but also the quality of marbling in Hanwoo beef, offering an additional means for improving beef quality evaluation systems.

Materials and Methods

Phenotype data

Phenotypic records for four carcass traits—carcass weight (CWT), back fat thickness (BFT), eye muscle area (EMA), and marbling score (MS)—and MF were collected from highly marbled Hanwoo steers (MS grades 6 - 9) slaughtered between 2021 and 2024 at a slaughterhouse in Pyeongchang, Gangwon Province, Korea. According to national carcass grading standards, the longissimus dorsi muscle was transversely sectioned between the last thoracic and first lumbar vertebrae for carcass imaging and trait measurement.

MF was evaluated using the F7 index calculated from images obtained at the carcass grading site using the KBM1 image analyzer (Insilicogen Inc., Korea), with the cooperation of the Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation (KAPE). To ensure consistency, all images were acquired by the same individual. The F7 index quantifies MF by computing the standard deviation of the marbling particle-to-tile area ratio across 40 × 40 tiles within each image. The F7 index was defined as follows (Lee et al., 2020; 2025):

(1)
F7 index =i=1nri-r¯2n-1

where, n is the total number of tiles, ri is the ratio of marbled particle area to tile area in the ith tile, and r¯ is the average ratio across all tiles.

Phenotypic data for all five traits were subjected to quality control using the interquartile range (IQR) method, resulting in a final dataset of 1,156 animals.

Genotype data

Genotype data were obtained by extracting DNA from tissue samples and performing genotyping using the Illumina BovineSNP50 version 3 and HanwooSNP50 version 1 arrays. The two datasets were merged using PLINK version 1.9 (Chang et al., 2015; Purcell and Chang, 2025), and overlapping SNPs located at the same genomic positions in both arrays were removed. SNP markers were further filtered based on the following quality control criteria: SNP call rate < 90%, minor allele frequency < 0.01, and significant deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p < 0.001). After filtering, 45,553 SNP markers remained for subsequent analyses.

Statistical analysis

Phenotypic records were adjusted using a linear model that included the fixed effects of slaughter year, season, and farm, with slaughter age as a covariate. MS is an ordinal categorical trait and was therefore treated as continuous, following common practice in beef cattle genetic evaluations.

The genomic estimated breeding values (gEBVs) and genetic parameters were estimated using the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) method implemented in the BLUPF90 software suite. The statistical model was as follows:

(2)
yi=Xibi+Ziui+ei,Varuiei=GσA200IσE2

where, yi is the vector of phenotypic records; Xi and Zi are incidence matrices for fixed and random additive genetic effects, respectively; bi is the vector of fixed effects; ui is the vector of random additive genetic effects; ei is the vector of residuals; G is the genomic relationship matrix; and I is the identity matrix. σA2 represents the additive genetic variance, and σE2 denotes the residual variance.

Heritability was calculated as:

(3)
h2=σA2σA2+σE2

To assess the relationship between gEBVs and observed phenotypes for each trait, Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and their statistical significance were calculated. Linear regression analyses were conducted to determine the coefficients of determination (R2), and scatter plots were generated for each trait.

Theoretical accuracy, based on prediction error variance (PEV), was calculated as:

(4)
 Accuracy PEV=1-PEVσA2

Realized accuracy, defined as the Pearson correlation between predicted gEBVs and observed phenotypes for individuals with masked validation, was calculated as:

(5)
 Accuracy COR=COR(y,u^)

where, y and u^ represent observed phenotypes and predicted gEBVs, respectively, for validation animals. A five-fold cross-validation procedure was used, with 20% of animals masked as validation individuals in each fold.

Results

Descriptive statistics for CWT, BFT, EMA, MS, and MF are summarized in Table 1 and illustrated in Fig. 1. The average slaughter age of the steers analyzed was 995.1 ± 42.66 days (approximately 32.63 months). The means and standard deviations for the five traits were as follows: CWT, 476.17 ± 43.64 kg; BFT, 13.18 ± 4.24 mm; EMA, 96.25 ± 9.65 cm2; MS, 7.11 ± 1.19; and MF, 0.29 ± 0.03. Because the dataset was collected from a single slaughterhouse and included only highly marbled carcasses with MS grades 6 - 9, grade 6 occurred most frequently in the analyzed population.

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics for slaughter age, carcass traits, and MF in Hanwoo cattle.

Trait Mean SD Min Max
Age (day) 955.1 42.63 791 1,119
CWT 476.17 43.64 361 590
BFT 13.18 4.24 1 25
EMA 96.25 9.65 72 122
MS 7.11 1.19 6 9
MF 0.29 0.03 0.2 0.38

Number of animals (n) = 1,156.

SD, standard deviation; Min, minimum; Max, maximum; CWT, carcass weight; BFT, back fat thickness; EMA, eye muscle area; MS, marbling score; MF, marbling fineness.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjoas/2025-052-03/N0030520307/images/kjoas_2025_523_279_F1.jpg
Fig. 1.

Distributions and boxplots of five traits in Hanwoo cattle (n = 1,156). (A) CWT, carcass weight; (B) BFT, back fat thickness; (C) EMA, eye muscle area; (D) MS, marbling score; (E) MF, marbling fineness.

Estimates of phenotypic variance, additive genetic variance, and heritability for each trait are presented in Table 2. The heritability estimates were 0.55 for CWT, 0.435 for BFT, 0.472 for EMA, and 0.305 for MS, with the heritability of MF estimated at 0.441.

Table 2.

Heritability estimates for carcass traits and MF in Hanwoo cattle.

Trait Genetic (co)variance Residual (co)variance Heritability
CWT 806.7 659.4 0.550
BFT 7.205 9.359 0.435
EMA 40.25 45 0.472
MS 0.421 0.960 0.305
MF 3.01E-04 3.82E-04 0.441

Number of animals (n) = 1,156.

CWT, carcass weight; BFT, back fat thickness; EMA, eye muscle area; MS, marbling score; MF, marbling fineness.

Genetic and phenotypic correlations among the five traits are shown in Table 3. Notably, MF showed strong genetic (0.639) and phenotypic (0.411) correlations with MS. Although MF exhibited a relatively high phenotypic correlation with EMA (0.428), its genetic correlation was low (0.198), suggesting a limited genetic association. Additionally, MS displayed moderate genetic correlations with CWT (0.243) and EMA (0.206), and a moderate phenotypic correlation of 0.411 with EMA.

Table 3.

Genetic and phenotypic correlations among slaughter age, carcass traits, and MF in Hanwoo cattle.

Trait CWT BFT EMA MS MF
CWT 1.000 0.021 0.523 0.243 0.136
BFT 0.439 1.000 -0.159 0.027 -0.029
EMA 0.412 0.083 1.000 0.206 0.198
MS -0.013 -0.002 0.411 1.000 0.639
MF 0.149 0.166 0.428 0.487 1.000

Number of animals (n) = 1,156.

Genetic and phenotypic correlations are above and below the diagonal, respectively.

CWT, carcass weight; BFT, back fat thickness; EMA, eye muscle area; MS, marbling score; MF, marbling fineness.

Correlation analyses between individual phenotypes and gEBVs revealed highly significant positive associations (p < 0.001) for all five traits (Table 4). The Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were 0.826 for CWT, 0.831 for BFT, 0.860 for EMA, 0.779 for MS, and 0.769 for MF. The corresponding coefficients of determination (R2) were 0.682, 0.691, 0.740, 0.607, and 0.591, respectively, indicating that gEBVs explained a substantial proportion of phenotypic variation in each trait (Table 4; Fig. 2).

Table 4.

Correlation between phenotypes and genomic estimated breeding values (gEBVs) in Hanwoo cattle.

Trait r R2 p-value
CWT 0.826 0.682 < 0.001
BFT 0.831 0.691 < 0.001
EMA 0.860 0.740 < 0.001
MS 0.779 0.607 < 0.001
MF 0.769 0.591 < 0.001

Number of animals (n) = 1,156.

r, Pearson’s correlation coefficient; R2, coefficient of determination; CWT, carcass weight; BFT, back fat thickness; EMA, eye muscle area; MS, marbling score; MF, marbling fineness.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjoas/2025-052-03/N0030520307/images/kjoas_2025_523_279_F2.jpg
Fig. 2.

Scatter plots showing the relationship between genomic estimated breeding values (gEBVs) and phenotypes for five traits in Hanwoo cattle (n = 1,156). (A) CWT, carcass weight; (B) BFT, back fat thickness; (C) EMA, eye muscle area; (D) MS, marbling score; (E) MF, marbling fineness.

The average gEBV accuracies based on PEV were 0.781 (range: 0.457 - 0.821) for CWT, 0.715 (0.423 - 0.772) for BFT, 0.738 (0.435 - 0.789) for EMA, 0.652 (0.386 - 0.726) for MS, and 0.714 (0.423 - 0.771) for MF (Table 5).

Additionally, the mean realized accuracies derived from cross-validation were 0.471 for CWT, 0.298 for BFT, 0.539 for EMA, 0.467 for MS, and 0.498 for MF, indicating that BFT had the lowest realized accuracy among all traits (Table 5).

Table 5.

Prediction accuracies of genomic estimated breeding values (gEBVs) in Hanwoo cattle.

Trait AccuracyPEV AccuracyCOR
Mean SD Min Max Mean SD SE
CWT 0.781 0.030 0.457 0.821 0.471 0.050 0.022
BFT 0.715 0.035 0.423 0.772 0.298 0.035 0.016
EMA 0.738 0.033 0.435 0.789 0.539 0.041 0.018
MS 0.652 0.041 0.386 0.726 0.467 0.049 0.022
MF 0.714 0.035 0.423 0.771 0.498 0.049 0.022

Number of animals (n) = 1,156.

AccuracyPEV, theoretical accuracy based on prediction error variance (PEV); AccuracyCOR, realized accuracy based on the Pearson correlation between observed phenotypes (y) and predicted gEBVs (û); SD, standard deviation; Min, minimum; Max, maximum; CWT, carcass weight; BFT, back fat thickness; EMA, eye muscle area; MS, marbling score; MF, marbling fineness.

Discussion

During the phenotypic data collection period (November 2024 to April 2025), national averages of CWT, BFT, EMA, and MS in 9,354 Hanwoo steers were 480 kg, 12 mm, 104 cm2, and 7.0, respectively (KAPE, 2024). Compared to these values, the mean CWT in this study was similar, while BFT was slightly thicker and EMA was slightly smaller. The average MS of 7.1, was comparable to the national average. However, since the dataset was limited to steers with MS grades 6 - 9, the observed mean was somewhat lower than expected—likely due to a higher proportion of animals with MS grade 6 (Fig. 1).

The mean MF, calculated using the F7 index, was 0.29 ± 0.03. According to Lee et al. (2020), an F7 index ≤ 0.25 indicates finely and evenly distributed intramuscular fat, whereas an index ≥0.35 reflects coarse and clustered fat. Thus, the observed MF suggests that the steers in this study generally exhibited fine marbling distributions.

Heritability estimates for carcass traits in Hanwoo cattle have varied across studies. Srivastava et al. (2019) reported heritabilities of 0.39 for CWT, BFT, and EMA, and 0.46 for MS, while Alam et al. (2023) reported 0.42 for CWT, 0.36 for both BFT and EMA, and 0.47 for MS. In the present study, heritability ranged from 0.305 to 0.550, suggesting moderate to high genetic control. Although MS showed the lowest heritability among the traits, it was still higher than the 0.22 reported by Bhuiyan et al. (2017). The restricted MS grade range (grades 6 - 9) likely reduced phenotypic variance, contributing to the relatively lower heritability.

Kuchida et al. (2006) and Kuchida and Kanai (2012) defined MF traits using image analysis in Japanese Black cattle and conducted genetic evaluations. Kato et al. (2014) and Kohama et al. (2021) reported that the heritability of Kuchida’s fineness index was 0.395 and 0.490, respectively. In this study, MF showed moderate heritability (0.44), comparable to that of the four carcass traits, suggesting that genetic improvement of MF in Hanwoo cattle through image analysis is feasible. Further studies on correlations between MF and other carcass traits are recommended to effectively incorporate MF into breeding programs. Notably, the F7 index in the present study showed strong genetic and phenotypic correlations with MS (r > 0.4), suggesting shared genetic and environmental influences. Additional analysis is required to optimize selection efficiency and fully utilize MF as a new trait.

Previous attempts to apply Kuchida’s fineness index to Hanwoo were less successful in distinguishing MS levels (Lee et al., 2018; 2019; Beak et al., 2021), possibly due to differences in body frame size and carcass grading regions between breeds (Lee et al., 2025). Consequently, several studies have advocated for a Hanwoo-specific (Lee and Choi, 2019; Lee et al., 2019). The F7 index has proven effective at distinguishing fine versus coarse marbling groups in highly marbled Hanwoo steers (MS grades 6 - 9). The F7 index evaluates marbling uniformity and distribution by calculating the standard deviation of marbling area ratios across image tiles, with higher index values indicating coarser marbling. Therefore, the inverse relationship between the F7 index and MF should be carefully considered when integrating MF into breeding strategies, along with other carcass traits.

Kim et al. (2021) used GBLUP to estimate correlations between phenotypes and gEBVs in Hanwoo cattle and reported correlation coefficients of 0.673 for CWT, 0.454 for BFT, 0.526 for EMA, and 0.654 for MS. All traits, except BFT (p < 0.01), showed high significance (p < 0.001). These results contrast with the lower correlations (0.190 - 0.337) reported using pedigree-based PBLUP, confirming the enhanced accuracy of gEBVs for individual genetic merit estimation. The present study found strong positive correlations (r = 0.769 - 0.860) between phenotypes and gEBVs and substantial R2 values (0.591 - 0.740) across all five traits, confirming that GBLUP effectively predicted individual breeding values.

Recent studies evaluating gEBV accuracy in Hanwoo cattle using 50K SNP arrays have reported values of 0.68 - 0.74 (Haque et al., 2024), 0.66 - 0.78 (Lopez et al., 2020), and 0.744 - 0.788 (Kim et al., 2023). Kim et al. (2023) emphasized the role of reference population size for accuracy improvement. In this study, PEV-based accuracies ranged from 0.652 to 0.781, closely aligning with previous findings. Notably, MF exhibited comparable accuracy (0.714) to other carcass traits.

However, realized accuracies based on cross-validation correlations ranged from 0.471 to 0.539 for all traits except BFT. Jang et al. (2022) also reported accuracies (0.35 - 0.417) using cross-validation, with BFT being the lowest. Consistently, BFT in the present study showed notably lower realized accuracy (0.298), despite a high overall correlation (r = 0.831) and high PEV-based accuracy (0.715). This discrepancy suggests limited predictive performance of gEBVs for BFT in the validation set, potentially due to suboptimal GBLUP model fitting in test scenarios. Given that BFT is a discrete trait, small ranking shifts can significantly impact its correlation with actual phenotypes, underscoring the inherent limitations in applying a generalized model across all traits.

Haque et al. (2024; 2025) showed that weighted GBLUP, which assigns different SNP-specific weights, improves gEBV accuracy. Jang et al. (2022) employed deep learning methods to further improve genetic prediction accuracy. These efforts reflect ongoing advancements aimed at better capturing the genetic potential of individual animals.

In Hanwoo cattle, the national genetic evaluation system heavily relies on the reference population, which integrates phenotypic, pedigree, and genomic data. Annually, approximately 1,300 progeny-tested steers and 2,000 genotyped animals are added. Genomic data currently account for 95% of the weighting in the combined relationship matrix under single-step GBLUP (Lee et al., 2022). Therefore, to achieve accurate MF evaluation, it is crucial to expand the reference population by integrating nationwide phenotypes, pedigree records, and genomic information, as well as refine analytical models through improved characterization of environmental factors.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that MF is a moderately heritable trait and shows a strong genetic correlation to MS. The significant correlation between MF and gEBVs, along with its predictive accuracy, suggests that MF can be enhanced through genetic selection. These findings indicate that MF can serve as a novel economic trait for quantifying intramuscular fat quality in Hanwoo cattle and may provide a foundation for developing genomic selection strategies aimed at enhancing beef quality.

Conflict of Interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Rural Development Administration Research Project (Project Name: Establishment of Line Population for Future Demand, Study of the Genetic Characteristics, and Development of Application Technology for Hanwoo, Project Number: PJ01502802). Appreciation is extended to all members of the Hanwoo Research Center, with special thanks to Geumsun Jeon and Sooja Hwang. Appreciation is also extended to the Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation (KAPE), the Pyeongchang-Yeongwol-Jeongseon Livestock Cooperative, and the slaughterhouse of Pyeongchang Enterprise Corp. for their cooperation.

References

1

Alam MZ, Haque MA, Iqbal A, Lee YM, Ha JJ, Jin S, Park B, Kim NY, Won JI, Kim JJ. 2023. Genome-wide association study to identify QTL for carcass traits in Korean Hanwoo cattle. Animals 13:2737.

10.3390/ani1317273737685003PMC10486602
2

Beak SH, Park SJ, Fassah DM, Kim HJ, Kim M, Jo C, Baik M. 2021. Relationships among carcass traits, auction price, and image analysis traits of marbling characteristics in Korean cattle beef. Meat Science 171:108268.

10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108268
3

Bhuiyan MSA, Kim HJ, Lee DH, Lee SH, Cho SH, Yang BS, Kim SD, Lee SH. 2017. Genetic parameters of carcass and meat quality traits in different muscles (longissimus dorsi and semimembranosus) of Hanwoo (Korean cattle). Journal of Animal Science 95:3359-3369.

10.2527/jas.2017.1493
4

Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LCAM, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, Lee JJ. 2015. Second-generation PLINK: Rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. GigaScience 4:7.

10.1186/s13742-015-0047-825722852PMC4342193
5

Haque MA, Iqbal A, Alam MZ, Lee YM, Ha JJ, Kim JJ. 2024. Estimation of genetic correlations and genomic prediction accuracy for reproductive and carcass traits in Hanwoo cows. Journal of Animal Science and Technology 66:682.

10.5187/jast.2023.e7539165742PMC11331368
6

Haque MA, Jang EB, Lee HD, Shin DH, Jang JH, Kim JJ. 2025. Performance of weighted genomic BLUP and Bayesian methods for Hanwoo carcass traits. Tropical Animal Health and Production 57:38.

10.1007/s11250-025-04293-y
7

Hocquette JF, Gondret F, Baéza E, Médale F, Jurie C, Pethick DW. 2010. Intramuscular fat content in meat-producing animals: Development, genetic and nutritional control, and identification of putative markers. Animal 4:303-319.

10.1017/S1751731109991091
8

Jang M, Lim D, Park W, Park JE. 2022. Estimation of genetic prediction accuracy using convolutional neural network in Hanwoo. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society 23:516-523. [in Korean]

10.5762/KAIS.2022.23.4.516
9

KAPE (Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation). 2024. Carcass grading statistics. Accessed in https://www.mtrace.go.kr/stats/stp/dtl/stl/xtlStatsList.do on 1 March 2025. [in Korean]

10

Kato K, Maeda S, Kuchida K. 2014. Genetic parameters for fineness of marbling in M. longissimus thoracis of Japanese Black cattle. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho (Animal Science Journal). 85:21-26. [in Japanese]

10.2508/chikusan.85.21
11

Kim EH, Kang HC, Myung CH, Kim JY, Sun DW, Lee DH, Lee SH, Lim HT. 2023. Comparison on genomic prediction using pedigree BLUP and single step GBLUP through the Hanwoo full-sib family. Animal Bioscience 36:1327.

10.5713/ab.22.032737170517PMC10472147
12

Kim EH, Sun DW, Kang HC, Kim JY, Myung CH, Lee DH, Lee SH, Lim HT. 2021. A study of the genomic estimated breeding value and accuracy using genotypes in Hanwoo steer (Korean cattle). Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 48:681-691. [in Korean]

10.7744/kjoas.20210057
13

Kohama N, Yoshida E, Masaki T, Iwamoto E, Fukushima M, Honda T, Oyama K. 2021. Estimation of genetic parameters for carcass grading traits, image analysis traits, and monounsaturated fatty acids in Japanese Black cattle from Hyogo Prefecture. Animal Science Journal 92:e13664.

10.1111/asj.13664
14

Kris-Etherton PM, Pearson TA, Wan Y, Hargrove RL, Moriarty K, Fishell V, Etherton TD. 1999. High-monounsaturated fatty acid diets lower both plasma cholesterol and triacylglycerol concentrations. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 70:1009-1015.

10.1093/ajcn/70.6.1009
15

Kuchida K, Kanai T. 2012. Methods for evaluating marbling of meat. Japan Patent No. 2012217934. [in Japanese]

16

Kuchida K, Osawa T, Hori T, Kotaka H, Maruyama S. 2006. Evaluation and genetics of carcass cross section of beef carcass by computer image analysis. The Journal of Animal Genetics 34:45-52. [in Japanese]

10.5924/abgri2000.34.2_45
17

Lee B, Choi YM. 2019. Correlation of marbling characteristics with meat quality and histochemical characteristics in longissimus thoracis muscle from Hanwoo steers. Food Science of Animal Resources 39:151.

10.5851/kosfa.2019.e1230882083PMC6411248
18

Lee B, Yoon S, Choi Y. 2019. Comparison of marbling fleck characteristics between beef marbling grades and its effect on sensory quality characteristics in high-marbled Hanwoo steer. Meat Science 152:109-115.

10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.02.019
19

Lee B, Yoon S, Lee Y, Oh E, Yun YK, Kim BD, Kuchida K, Oh HK, Choe J, Choi YM. 2018. Comparison of marbling fleck characteristics and objective tenderness parameters with different marbling coarseness within longissimus thoracis muscle of high-marbled Hanwoo steer. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources 38:606-614.

10.5851/kosfa.2018.38.3.60630018503PMC6048382
20

Lee S, Chung K, Kim H, Kang B, Choi N, Baek J, Kim B, Jung Y, Yoon Y, Park S, et al. 2020. Method for measuring marbling fineness using intramuscular fat image of Hanwoo sirloin. Korea Patent No. 10-2118103. [in Korean]

21

Lee SH, Dang CG, Park M, Lee SS, Lee YC, Lee JG, Chang HK, Yoon HB, Cho C, Lee SH, et al. 2022. Comparison of the estimated breeding value and accuracy by imputation reference Beadchip platform and scaling factor of the genomic relationship matrix in Hanwoo cattle. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 49:431-440. [in Korean]

10.7744/kjoas.20220038
22

Lee WY, Dinh PTN, Chung Y, Lee HJ, Koh YJ, Kim HJ, Jin S, Lee J, Lee JH, Chung KY, et al. 2025. Precise phenotyping method using image data for carcass marbling score in Hanwoo cattle. PLOS ONE 20:e0318058.

10.1371/journal.pone.031805839854587PMC11760004
23

Lopez BI, Lee SH, Shin DH, Oh JD, Chai HH, Park W, Park JE, Lim D. 2020. Accuracy of genomic evaluation using imputed high-density genotypes for carcass traits in commercial Hanwoo population. Livestock Science 241:104256.

10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104256
24

Purcell S, Chang C. 2025. PLINK. Ver. 1.9. Accessed in https://www.cog-genomics.org/plink/1.9/ on 1 March 2025.

25

Smith SB. 2016. Marbling and its nutritional impact on risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources 36:435.

10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.4.43527621682PMC5018501
26

Srivastava S, Lopez BI, De las Heras-Saldana S, Park JE, Shin DH, Chai HH, Park W, Lee SH, Lim D. 2019. Estimation of genetic parameters by single-trait and multi-trait models for carcass traits in Hanwoo cattle. Animals 9:1061.

10.3390/ani912106131810212PMC6941083
27

WHO (World Health Organization). 2003. Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases: Report of a Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series No. 916.

페이지 상단으로 이동하기