All Issue

2025 Vol.52, Issue 4 Preview Page

Review Article

1 December 2025. pp. 587-595
Abstract
References
1

Ahmadi A, Kavosi MR, Soltanloo H. 2014. Zelkova carpinifolia reservoir from Hyrcanian Forests, Northern Iran, a new sacrifice of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Biodiversitas 15:48-52.

10.13057/biodiv/d150107
2

Brasier CM, Kirk SA. 2001. Designation of the EAN and NAN races of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi as subspecies. Mycological Research 105:547-554.

10.1017/S0953756201004087
3

Brasier CM, Webber JF. 2019. Is there evidence for post-epidemic attenuation in the Dutch elm disease pathogen Ophiostoma novo-ulmi? Plant Pathology 68:921-929.

10.1111/ppa.13022
4

Brasier CM. 2000. Intercontinental spread and continuing evolution of the Dutch elm disease pathogens. In The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management edited by Dunn CP. pp. 61-72. Springer, Boston, MA.

10.1007/978-1-4615-4507-1_4
5

CABI (Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International). 2021. Ophiostoma novo-ulmi (Dutch elm disease). Accessed in https://doi.org/10.1079/cabicompendium.37594 on 1 September 2025.

10.1079/cabicompendium.37594
6

Cha KH, Seo DJ, Noh MY, Han YS, Jung WJ. 2020. Major host plant and life cycle of pest in arboretum of Chonnam National University. Trends in Agriculture & Life Sciences 58:29-36. [in Korean]

10.29335/tals.2020.58.29
7

Copeland CA, Harper RW, Brazee NJ, Bowlick FJ. 2023. A review of Dutch elm disease and new prospects for Ulmus americana in the urban environment. Arboricultural Journal 45:3-29.

10.1080/03071375.2022.2082177
8

De Beer ZW, Procter M, Wingfield MJ, Marincowitz S, Duong TA. 2022. Generic boundaries in the Ophiostomatales reconsidered and revised. Studies in Mycology 101:57-120.

10.3114/sim.2022.101.0236059894PMC9365045
9

DiGuistini S, Wang Y, Liao NY, Taylor G, Tanguay P, Feau N, Henrissat B, Chan SK, Hesse-Orce U, Alamouti SM, et al. 2011. Genome and transcriptome analyses of the mountain pine beetle-fungal symbiont Grosmannia clavigera, a lodgepole pine pathogen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108:2504-2509.

10.1073/pnas.101128910821262841PMC3038703
10

Doccola JJ, Strom BL, Brownie C, Klepzig KD. 2011. Impact of systemic fungicides on lesions formed by inoculation with the bluestain fungus (Ophiostoma minus) in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Arboriculture and Urban Forestry 37:288.

10.48044/jauf.2011.037
11

Humble LM, Allen EA. 2006. Forest biosecurity: Alien invasive species and vectored organisms. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 28:S256-S269.

10.1080/07060660609507383
12

Juzwik J, Harrington TC, MacDonald WL, Appel DN. 2008. The origin of Ceratocystis fagacearum, the oak wilt fungus. Annual Review of Phytopathology 46:13-26.

10.1146/annurev.phyto.45.062806.094406
13

KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2023a. Overview of the Tree Doctor and Arborist Certification System. [in Korean]

14

KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2023b. Pine Wilt Disease Control Guidelines. [in Korean]

15

KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2025. Forest Pest and Disease Monitoring and Control Plan. [in Korean]

16

Kim KH, Choi YJ, Seo ST, Shin HD. 2009. Raffaelea quercus-mongolicae sp. nov. associated with Platypus koryoensis on oak in Korea. Mycotaxon 110:189-197.

10.5248/110.189
17

Lee DH, Jung JM, Seo ST. 2021. Population genetic structure of Raffaelea quercus-mongolicae indicates a recent fungal introduction event to Jeju Island from inland areas of South Korea. Plant Pathology 70:1871-1882.

10.1111/ppa.13427
18

Lee DH, Nam Y, Wingfield MJ, Park H. 2022. First report of Dutch elm disease caused by Ophiostoma novo-ulmi in South Korea. Forests 13:968.

10.3390/f13070968
19

MacDonald WL, Double ML, Stauder CM, Winfree K. 2017. The Glenwood Estate: Our 32-year experience using Arbotect® 20-S to control Dutch elm disease. In: Proceedings of the American Elm Restoration Workshop 2016. General Technical Report NRS-P-174. pp. 43-48. Newtown Square, PA: USFS, NRS.

20

Martín JA, Domínguez J, Solla A, Brasier CM, Webber JF, Santini A, Martínez AC, Bernier L, Gil L. 2023. Complexities underlying the breeding and deployment of Dutch elm disease resistant elms. New Forests 54:661-696.

10.1007/s11056-021-09865-y37361260PMC10287581
21

Masuya H, Brasier C, Ichihara Y, Kubono T, Kanzaki N. 2010. First report of the Dutch elm disease pathogens Ophiostoma ulmi and O. novo-ulmi in Japan. Plant Pathology 59:805-805.

10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02239.x
22

Moltzan BD. 2003. Emerging hardwood pest problems and implications for the Central Hardwood region. In: Proceedings of the 13th Central Hardwood Forest Conference. General Technical Report NC-234. pp. 511-517. St. Paul, MN: USFS, NCRS.

23

NIFoS (National Institute of Forest Science). 2024a. Investigating the Disease Ecology and Developing Control Methods for Dutch Elm Disease. [in Korean]

24

NIFoS (National Institute of Forest Science). 2024b. Development of Diagnostic Methods for Dutch Elm Disease (DED) Pathogen. [in Korean]

25

Ploetz RC, Hulcr J, Wingfield MJ, de Beer ZW. 2013. Destructive tree diseases associated with ambrosia and bark beetles: Black swan events in tree pathology? Plant disease 97:856-872.

10.1094/PDIS-01-13-0056-FE
26

Santini A, Faccoli M. 2015. Dutch elm disease and elm bark beetles: A century of association. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry 8:126.

10.3832/ifor1231-008
27

Tarigan M, Roux J, Van Wyk M, Tjahjono B, Wingfield MJ. 2011. A new wilt and die-back disease of Acacia mangium associated with Ceratocystis manginecans and C. acaciivora sp. nov. in Indonesia. South African Journal of Botany 77:292-304.

10.1016/j.sajb.2010.08.006
Information
  • Publisher :Institute of Agricultural Science, Chungnam National University
  • Publisher(Ko) :충남대학교 농업과학연구소
  • Journal Title :Korean Journal of Agricultural Science
  • Journal Title(Ko) :농업과학연구
  • Volume : 52
  • No :4
  • Pages :587-595
  • Received Date : 2025-09-10
  • Revised Date : 2025-10-13
  • Accepted Date : 2025-10-14