Effect of mixed organic acid and levan type fructan supplementation on improving performance and reducing gas emission of weaned pigs

Madesh Muniyappan1Hyung Suk Hwang11In Ho Kim1*


The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the effect of mixed organic acids (MOAs) and levan type fructan (LYF) supplementation on the growth performance and fecal gas emission of weaned pigs. A total of 72 weaned pigs (Duroc × [Yorkshire × Landrace], average weight of 21.00 ± 0.78 kg) were randomly allotted to one of three dietary treatments with six replicate pens per treatment two barrows and two gilts per pen. The dietary treatments were as follows: (1) corn-soybean basal diet (CON); (2) CON + 0.1% MOAs (MOAs); (3) CON + 0.05% LYF (LYF). The experiment period lasted for 14 days. Dietary inclusion of MOAs and LYF increased (p = 0.036) body weight (BW) at day 14, (p = 0.001, p = 0.030) as well as average daily gain (ADG) and gain: feed (G : F) at day 14. However, dietary supplementation of MOAs and LYF reduced (p = 0.018) the fecal score at day 14. In addition, dietary inclusion of MOAs and LYF to the basal diet significantly reduced (p = 0.016) fecal NH3 emission on day 14 compared with pigs fed the control. Thus, MOAs and LYF supplementation positively affected growth performance and fecal NH3 emission in weaning pigs.



After weaning, pigs are easily exposed to weaning stress due to their undeveloped immune and digestive systems and the sudden changes on environment and diet, which may result in a reduction of feed intake and nutrient absorption, as well as an increase of gastrointestinal disorder, diarrhea rate and mortality rate and stunted growth of piglets (Ma et al., 2021). Therefore, antibiotics have often been added to the feed of weaned piglets to prevent diarrhea and improve growth performance (Liu et al., 2018, Sureshkumar and Kim, 2021). However, the abuse of antibiotics in feed can increase the risk of bacterial cross-resistance and residue of antibiotics in animal products, which might be harmful for the human health (Suiryanrayna and Ramana, 2015). In 2006, the European Union banned the addition of antibiotics to feed, and the United States and China have gradually begun to ban the use of antibiotics. Consequently, safe and green feed additives replacing antibiotics were found to solve the negative effect of antibiotics and also improve performance in pigs. Previous studies in our laboratory had proved that organic acids (Muniyappan et al., 2021), Probiotic (Balasubramanian et al., 2017; Sampath et al., 2022), β-mannanase (Balasubramanian et al., 2018), Yeast (Sampath et al., 2021), Xylanase (Lee et al., 2018), and levan-type fructan (Li et al., 2019a) could be used as substitutes of antibiotics in weaned pigs. Organic acids (OAs) are widely used in livestock production because of their advantages such as lowering the pH value of the gastrointestinal tract, improving the structure of the intestinal microbial flora, immune function and performance (Ahmed et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2019a). Several researchers have demonstrated that the application of a small amount of mixed organic acids (MOAs) has had a wide range of effects compared with that of a single OAs in weaning pigs (Kim et al., 2005; Partanen et al., 2007; Balasubramanian et al., 2016). Fructans, which are normally isolated from plants under natural conditions and can also be produced by some microorganisms, are nonstructural carbohydrates that differ in molecular structure and molecular weight. They may be classified into 3 main types: the inulin group, the levan group, and the branched group. The inulin group consists of the material that is mostly or exclusively the β-2,1 fructosyl-fructose linkage, and nearly all fructans found in plants are of this type. The levan group fructan is the material that contains mostly or exclusively the β-2,6 fructosyl-fructose linkage. The branched group has both β-2,1 and β-2,6 fructosylfructose linkages in substantial amounts. Levan-type fructan (LYF) is considered to be a prebiotic and has a variety of nutritional and pharmaceutical functions, including promoting the absorption of metallic ions (Ohta et al., 1993), having bifidogenic (Banguela and Hernández, 2006), anti-inflammatory (Vigants et al., 2001), and immunomodulatory effects (Calazans et al., 1997), improving nutrient digestibility (Zhao et al., 2012) and having health-promoting effects, such as reducing serum cholesterol, preventing colon cancer, and producing B vitamins (Banguela and Hernández, 2006).

However, additional research is needed to assess the effect of MOAs and LYF on growth performance, fecal score, and gas emission traits of weaning pigs. Thus, the objective of the current experiment was to investigate the effects of MOAs and LYF on growth performance, fecal score and fecal gas emission in weaned pigs.

Materials and Methods

Animal ethics

The experimental protocols describing the management and care of animals were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Dankook University, Cheonan, South Korea (DK-1-1908).

Source of MOAs and LYF

The protected MOAs used in the current experiment is provided by a commercial company (Morningbio Co., Ltd., Cheonan, Korea). The active substance is 17% fumaric acid, 13% citric acid, 10% malic acid, benzoic acid 10%, and 1.2% MCFAs (capric and caprylic acid), and carrier vegetable oil 48.8%.

LYF was prepared via enzyme reaction using levansucrase from Zymomonas mobilis, purchased from the RealBioTech Co. (Daejeon, Korea). This source of fructan is different from inulin, which consists of β-(2,1)-linked fructose units and its partial hydrolysate, fructooligosaccharides. The average degree of polymerization is 10 and the average molecular weight is 700 kDa.

Animals and diets

A total of 72 weaned pigs (Duroc × [Landrace × Yorkshire] average weight of 21.44 ± 0.78 kg) were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 dietary treatments with 6 replicate pens per treatment (2 barrows and 2 gilts per pen). As shown in Table 1, nutrients in the diet met the recommended requirements (NRC, 2012). The dietary treatments were as follows: (1) corn-soybean basal diet (CON); (2) CON + 0.1% MOAs (MOAs); (3) CON + 0.05% LYF (LYF). The experiment period was lasted for 14 days. The pigs were kept in 1.2 m × 2 m experimental pens with plastic slatted floors. Each pen was fitted with an adjustable stainless steel feeder and a duckbill drinker. The temperature, humidity, CO2 and ammonium concentration of the air in a pig house was automatically controlled. The temperature was maintained at 24 - 28℃, and the relative humidity was controlled at 60 - 70%. The pigs had free access to water and feed ad libitum.

Table 1. Composition of basal diets (as-fed basis).http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/images/N0030500101_image/Table_KJOAS_50_01_01_T1.png

y Provided per kg diet: Fe, 115 mg as ferrous sulfate; Cu, 70 mg as copper sulfate; Mn, 20 mg as manganese oxide; Zn, 60 mg as zinc oxide; I, 0.5 mg as potassium iodide; and Se, 0.3 mg as sodium selenite.

z Provided per kilograms of diet: vitamin A, 13,000 IU; vitamin D3, 1,700 IU; vitamin E, 60 IU; vitamin K3, 5 mg; vitamin B1, 4.2 mg; vitamin B2, 19 mg; vitamin B6, 6.7 mg; vitamin B12, 0.05 mg; biotin, 304. mg; folic acid, 2.1 mg; niacin, 55 mg; D-calcium pantothenaet, 45 mg.

Growth performance traits

Piglets were weighed on day 1 and day 14 of the experiment as well as recorded the feed consumption to calculate average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI) and feed conversion ratio (FCR = ADFI/ADG). The fecal score was recorded daily following the method recommended by (Long et al., 2018).

Fecal gas emission

For the analysis of the fecal NH3, methyl mercaptans, and H2S, and acetic acid the fresh feces were collected from randomly selected 6 pigs per treatment (1 gilt and 1 barrow per pen per treatment) on the day 1 and day 14. The total sampled feces was then thawed and homogenized. Then, the stock feces (300 g) were stored in 2.6-L plastic boxes with a small hole in the middle of one side sealed with adhesive plaster. The samples were fermented for 24 h at room temperature (25℃), and 100 mL of the headspace air was sampled from approximately 2.0 cm above the fecal sample. After the collection, the box was re-sealed with adhesive plaster to measure the fecal noxious content. The fecal samples were manually shaken for approximately 30 s before measurement to disrupt any crust formation on the surface of the fecal sample and to homogenize the samples. Concentrations of NH3, S, methyl mercaptans, acetic acid were measured within the scopes of 5.0 - 100.0 ppm (No. 3La, detector tube, Gastec Corp., Kanagawa, Japan) and 2.0 - 20.0 ppm (4LK, detector tube, Gastec Corp., Kanagawa, Japan).

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed as a completely randomized Duncan’s multiple range test using GLM procedures of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), the pen was served as the experimental unit. Variability in the data was expressed as pooled standard error, and a probability level of p < 0.05 was considered significant and p <0.10 as trends.


Growth performance and fecal score

The effect of MOAs and LYF supplementation in weaning pig’s growth performance is shown in Table 2. During day 14, pigs fed the diet supplemented with a MOAs and LYF have significantly improved (p = 0.036) BW gain compared to pigs fed CON. In addition, MOAs and LYF supplementation have significantly increased (p = 0.001, p = 0.030) ADG and G : F ratio without any effects (p > 0.05) on ADFI. Compared with CON, MOAs and LYF had significantly decreased (p = 0.016) the fecal score in day 14 (Table 3).

Fecal gas emission

Dietary MOAs and LYF supplementation have significantly reduced fecal NH3 emission (p = 0.016). However there was no difference of fecal H2S, methyl mercaptans and acetic acid emissions (Table 4).

Table 2. Effect of dietary mixed organic acid and levan fructan supplementation on growth performance in weaning pigs.http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/images/N0030500101_image/Table_KJOAS_50_01_01_T2.png

CON, corn-soybean basal diet; MOAs, mixed organic acids; LYF, levan type fructan; ADG, average daily gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake; G : F, gain : feed; SEM, standard error of mean

Table 3. Effect of dietary mixed organic acid and levan fructan supplementation on fecal score in weaning pigs.http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/images/N0030500101_image/Table_KJOAS_50_01_01_T3.png

CON, corn-soybean basal diet; MOAs, mixed organic acids; LYF, levan type fructan; SEM, standard error of means.

zFecal score = 1 hard, dry pellet; 2 firm, formed stool; 3 soft, moist stool that retains shape; 4 soft, unformed stool that assumes shape of container; 5 watery liquid that can be poured.

Table 4. Effect dietary mixed organic acid and levan fructan supplementation on gas emission in weaning pigs.http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/images/N0030500101_image/Table_KJOAS_50_01_01_T4.png

CON, corn-soybean basal diet; MOAs, mixed organic acids; LYF, levan type fructan; NH3, ammonia; H2S, hydrogen sulfide; SEM, standard error of means.


Growth performance

The application of MOAs in pig production was suggestion in review article published by (Nguyen et al., 2020). Many studies have proved the utility of MOAs as a potential alternative to antibiotic in developing performance and enhancing microbial flora in pigs (Upadhaya et al., 2014a; Li et al., 2019b). In the present study, we demonstrated that MOAs supplementation improved BW, ADG and G : F in weaning pigs compared with CON, which was similar to the results of Upadhaya et al. (2018) who reported that piglets fed MOAs 0.1% and 0.5% respectively could show improved the growth performance, which positive effect on preventing fecal score in weaning pigs. Similarly, Upadhaya et al. (2016) and Yang et al. (2019b) also reported that weaned pigs fed 0.4% MOAs such as fumaric, lactic, propionic, citric, and benzoic acid have significantly improved ADG and G : F compared with pigs fed a CON diet. On the other hand, Zentek et al. (2013) did not observe significant difference in the growth performance due to supplementation of MOAs. The inconsistent result on growth performance among different studies may be due to several diet complexity, types of acid, age and the health status of pigs.

In the present research, supplementation of the LYF significantly improved weaned piglets performance. The positive performance response could be attributed to the synergistic effect between different active ingredients in this blend which are characterized by possessing antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial activities beside the stimulant property of the digestive enzymes with subsequent positive impact on the gut microbial ecosystem, nutrient utilization, and performance parameters (Li et al., 2019a). Significantly improvements in the weaned pigs performance were observed due to feeding on diets supplementation by LYF at levels of 0.1 - 1.0% diet (BW, ADG and G : F during day 42; Lei et al., 2018), LYF at a level of 0.5 - 2.0% diet (ADG and G : F; Li and Kim, 2013) and levan at a levels 0.5 - 1.0 g·kg-1 diet (ADG and G : F; Zhang and Kim, 2014).

Fecal gas emission

Due to intensification and large scales of production, harmful gases are produced in livestock farms. These harmful substances produced in feces contribute to climate change and may cause adverse effects on the health of humans and animals (Nguyen et al., 2020; Muniyappan et al., 2022). The addition of probiotics to feed can effectively decrease the level of ammonia, fecal pH, and volatile organic matter in feces of growing pigs. For instance, Chu et al. (2011) noted that the supplementation of prebiotics and OAs in the diet diminished the production of harmful gases, reduced the sulfur compounds and ammonia compounds in feces, thus bringing down the toxicity and smell of feces. It has been agreed that nitrogen and sulfur are one of the major environmental pollutants. In the study, we found that supplementing the diet with 0.1% MOAs significantly decreased fecal NH3 gas emission in weaned pigs. This is in agreement with Upadhaya et al. (2014b), who reported the addition of MOAs 0.2% had significantly reduces fecal NH3 gas emission. Hossain et al. (2015) also reported that pigs fed with diet blends of organic acid have significantly reduced fecal NH3 gas emission compared with a CON diet. In contract, Devi et al. (2016) reported that the dietary inclusion of blends of organic acid had no influence on NH3, methyl mercaptans, and acetic acid in weaning pigs and sows. Similarly, Upadhaya et al. (2018) reported that the MOAs supplementation had no significant effect on fecal gas emission in weaning pigs.

Supplementation of LYF significantly decreased fecal NH3 gas emission. Similarly, Zhao et al. (2013a) reported a significantly decreased in the fecal NH3 gas emission of pigs fed due to dietary LYF supplementation. Zhao et al. (2013b) reported a significantly decreased in the fecal NH3 gas emission of pigs fed due to dietary supplementation of LYF at levels of 0.25 - 0.50%. On the other end, Lei et al. (2018) did not observe significant difference in the fecal gas emission due to supplementation of LYF. The contradictory results between the various experiments may be due to the age of weaning pigs, variations in amounts of LYF levels and variations in dietary compositions. Thus, the addition of MOAs and LYF is propitious to maintain the balance of the intestinal flora through increasing the benefical bacteria, thereby reducing the concentration of ammonia in the feces.


The present research demonstrated that the growth performance improved and fecal score and fecal NH3 gas emission reduced in pigs fed diet supplemented with LYF when compared with CON. Hence, LYF can be considered as a potential alternative to antibiotics in order to positive effects on the growth performance in weaning pigs.

Conflict of Interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Ethical Approval

All procedures involving animals were conducted in line with the protocol approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Dankook University. (Protocol number: DK-2-2114).

Data availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Authors Information

Madesh Muniyappan, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4677-9350

Hyung Suk Hwang, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1314-8891

In Ho Kim, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6652-2504


The Department of Animal Resource & Science was supported through the Research-Focused Department Promotion & Interdisciplinary Convergence Research Projects as a part of the University Innovation Support Program for Dankook University in 2022.

Author Contributions

MM, HSH and IHK: Conceptualization and designed the trials. MM: writing – original draft preparation, performed the animal trials, MM, HSH and KH: Software, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing – review and editing, IHK: Supervision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.


1 Ahmed ST, Hwang JA, Hoon J, Mun HS, Yang CJ. 2014. Comparison of single and blend acidifiers as alternative to antibiotics on growth performance, fecal microflora, and humoral immunity in weaned piglets. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 27:93. DOI:10.5713/ajas.2013.13411.  

2 Balasubramanian B, Ingale SL, Park JH, Rathi PC, Sureshkumar S, Kim IH. 2018. Inclusion of dietary β-mannanase improves performance and ileal digestibility and reduces ileal digesta viscosity of broilers fed corn-soybean meal-based diet. Poultry Science 97:3097-3101. DOI:10.3382/ps/pey157.  

3 Balasubramanian B, Park JW, Kim IH. 2016. Evaluation of the effectiveness of supplementing micro-encapsulated organic acids and essential oils in diets for sows and suckling piglets. Italian Journal of Animal Science 15:626-633. DOI:10.1080/1828051X.2016.1222243.  

4 Balasubramanian B, Lee SI, Kim IH. 2017. Inclusion of dietary multi-species probiotic on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, meat quality traits, fecal microbiota and diarrhea score in growing-finishing pigs. Italian Journal of Animal Science 17:100-106. DOI:10.1080/1828051X.2017.1340097.  

5 Banguela A, Hernández L. 2006. Fructans: From natural sources to transgenic plants. Biotecnología Aplicada 23:202-210.  

6 Calazans GMT, Lopes CE, Lima RMOC. 1997. Antitumour activities of levans produced by Zymomonas mobilis strains. Biotechnology Letters 19:19-21. DOI:10.1023/A:1018350617120.  

7 Chu GM, Lee SJ, Jeong HS, Lee SS. 2011. Efficacy of probiotics from anaerobic microflora with prebiotics on growth performance and noxious gas emission in growing pigs. Animal Science Journal 82:282-290. DOI:10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00828.x.  

8 Devi SM, Lee KY, Kim IH. 2016. Analysis of the effect of dietary protected organic acid blend on lactating sows and their piglets. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 45:39-47. DOI:10.1590/S1806-92902016000200001.  

9 Hossain MM, Jayaraman B, Kim SC, Lee KY, Kim IH, Nyachoti CM. 2015. Effects of a matrix-coated organic acids and medium-chain fatty acids blend on performance, and in vitro fecal noxious gas emissions in growing pigs fed in-feed antibiotic-free diets. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 98:433-442. DOI:10.1139/cjas-2017-0053.  

10 Kim YY, Kil DY, Oh HK, Han IK. 2005. Acidifier as an alternative material to antibiotics in animal feed. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 18:1048-1060. DOI:10.5713/ajas.2005.1048.  

11 Lee KY, Balasubramanian B, Kim JK, Kim IH. 2018. Dietary inclusion of xylanase improves growth performance, apparent total tract nutrient digestibility, apparent ileal digestibility of nutrients and amino acids and alters gut microbiota in growing pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 235:105-109. DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.11.015.  

12 Lei XJ, Kim YM, Park JH, Baek DH, Nyachoti CM, Kim IH. 2018. Effects of levan-type fructan on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, diarrhoea scores, faecal shedding of total lactic acid bacteria and coliform bacteria, and faecal gas emission in weaning pigs. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 98:1539-1544. DOI:10.1002/jsfa.8625.  

13 Li HL, Shi H, Zhao PY, Lei Y, Kim IH. 2019a. Effects of dietary levan-type fructan on growth performance, blood profiles, fecal noxious gas emissions, and litter performance in lactating sows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 100:308-316. DOI:10.1139/cjas-2018-0160.  

14 Li J, Kim IH. 2013. Effects of levan-type fructan supplementation on growth performance, digestibility, blood profile, fecal microbiota, and immune responses after lipopolysaccharide challenge in growing pigs. Animal Sciences Journal 91:5336-5343. DOI:10.2527/jas.2013-6665.  

15 Li M, Long S, Wang Q, Zhang L, Hu J, Yang J, Piao X. 2019b. Mixed organic acids improve nutrients digestibility, volatile fatty acids composition and intestinal microbiota in growing-finishing pigs fed high-fiber diet. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 32:856-864. DOI:10.5713/ajas.18.0517.  

16 Liu Y, Espinosa CD, Abelilla JJ, Casas GA, Lagos LV, Lee SA, Stein HH. 2018. Non-antibiotic feed additives in diets for pigs: A review. Animal Nutrition 4:113-125. DOI:10.1016/j.aninu.2018.01.007.  

17 Long SF, Xu YT, Pan L, Wang QQ, Wang CL, Wu JY, Piao XS. 2018. Mixed organic acids as antibiotic substitutes improve performance, serum immunity, intestinal morphology and microbiota for weaned piglets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 235:23-32. DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.08.018.  

18 Ma J, Piao X, Shang Q, Long S, Liu S, Mahfuz S. 2021. Mixed organic acids as an alternative to antibiotics improve serum biochemical parameters and intestinal health of weaned piglets. Animal Nutrition 7:737-749. DOI:10.1016/j.aninu.2020.11.018.  

19 Muniyappan M, Palanisamy T, Kim IH. 2021. Effect of microencapsulated organic acids on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profile, fecal gas emission, fecal microbial, and meat-carcass grade quality of growing-finishing pigs. Livestock Science 252:104658. DOI:10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104658.  

20 Muniyappan M, Hwang HS, Kim IH. 2022. Effects of dehulled lupin kernel (DLK) supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine, fecal microbiota and fecal noxious gas emission in growing pigs. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 49:531-537.  

21 Nguyen DH, Seok WJ, Kim IH. 2020. Organic acids mixture as a dietary additive for pigs-a review. Animals 10:952. DOI:10.3390/ani10060952.  

22 NRC (National Research Council). 2012. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th ed. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., USA.  

23 Ohta A, Osakabe N, Yamada K, Saito Y, Hidaka HJ. 1993. Effect of fructooligosuccharides and other saccharities on Ca, Mg, and P absorption in rats. Japan Society of Nutrition and Food Science 46:123-129.  

24 Partanen K, Jalava T, Valaja J. 2007. Effects of a dietary organic acid mixture and of dietary fibre levels on ileal and faecal nutrient apparent digestibility, bacterial nitrogen flow, microbial metabolite concentrations and rate of passage in the digestive tract of pigs. Animals 1:389-401. DOI:10.1017/S1751731107657838.  

25 Sampath V, Duk HB, Kibria S, Kim IH. 2022. Effect of low-nutrient-density diet with probiotic mixture (Bacillus subtilis ms1, B. licheniformis SF5-1, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation on performance of weaner pigs. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 106:61-68. DOI:10.1111/jpn.13544.  

26 Sampath V, Heon Baek D, Shanmugam S, Kim IH. 2021. Dietary inclusion of blood plasma with yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation enhanced the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, lactobacillus count, and reduced gas emissions in weaning pigs. Animals 11:759. DOI:10.3390/ani11030759.  

27 Suiryanrayna MV, Ramana JV. 2015. A review of the effects of dietary organic acids fed to swine. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 6:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-015-0042-z.  

28 Sureshkumar S, Kim IH. 2021. Impact of phase feeding: Effects on the growth performance of sows and their litter characteristics. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 48:265-272.  

29 Upadhaya SD, Lee KY, Kim IH. 2014a. Influence of protected organic acid blends and diets with different nutrient densities on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and faecal noxious gas emission in growing pigs. Veterinarni Medicina 59:491-497.  

30 Upadhaya SD, Lee KY, Kim IH. 2014b. Protected organic acid blends as an alternative to antibiotics in finishing pigs. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 27:1600-1607. DOI:10.5713/ajas.2014.14356.  

31 Upadhaya SD, Lee KY, Kim IH. 2016. Effect of protected organic acid blends on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and faecal micro flora in growing pigs. Journal of Applied Animal Research 44:238-242. DOI:10.1080/09712119.2015.1031775.  

32 Upadhaya SD, Lee KY, Serpunja S, Song TH, Kim IH. 2018. Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal microbiota and fecal noxious gas emission in weaning pigs fed high and low density diet with and without protected organic acid blends. Animal Feed Science and Technology 239:1-8. DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.12.013.  

33 Vigants A, Hicke HG, Marx SP. 2001. A simple and efficient method for the purification of membrane-bound levansucrase from Zymomonas mobilis. Current Microbiology 42:415-418. DOI:10.1007/s002840010239.  

34 Yang C, Zhang L, Cao G, Feng J, Yue M, Xu Y, Guo X. 2019a. Effects of dietary supplementation with essential oils and organic acids on the growth performance, immune system, fecal volatile fatty acids, and microflora community in weaned piglets. Journal of Animal Science 97:133-143. DOI:10.1093/jas/sky426.  

35 Yang Y, Lee KY, Kim IH. 2019b. Effects of dietary protected organic acids on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal microflora, diarrhea score, and fecal gas emission in weanling pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 99:514-520. DOI:10.1139/cjas-2018-0159.  

36 Zentek J, Ferrara F, Pieper R, Tedin L, Meyer W, Vahjen W. 2013. Effects of dietary combinations of organic acids and medium chain fatty acids on the gastrointestinal microbial ecology and bacterial metabolites in the digestive tract of weaning piglets. Animal Science Journal 91:3200-3210. DOI:10.2527/jas.2012-5673.  

37 Zhang ZF, Kim IH. 2014. Effects of levan supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and fecal dry matter content in comparison to apramycin (antibacterial growth promoter) in weanling pigs. Livestock Science 159:71-74. DOI:10.1016/j.livsci.2013.10.027.  

38 Zhao PY, Jung JH, Kim IH. 2012. Effect of mannan oligosaccharides and fructan on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profile, and diarrhea score in weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science 90:833-839. DOI:10.2527/jas.2011-3921.  

39 Zhao PY, Wang JP, Kim IH. 2013a. Effect of dietary levan fructan supplementation on growth performance, meat quality, relative organ weight, cecal microflora, and excreta noxious gas emission in broilers. Animal Science Journal 91:5287-5293. DOI:10.2527/jas.2012-5464.  

40 Zhao PY, Wang JP, Kim IH. 2013b. Evaluation of dietary fructan supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, meat quality, fecal microbial flora, and fecal noxious gas emission in finishing pigs. Animal Science Journal 91:5280-5286. DOI:10.2527/jas.2012-5393.